I love how ENDG4MER did the exact same shit they’re accusing me of but even more so. I provided numbers, shitbird. You didn’t even do THAT much. Just some hyperbolic conjecture based on not a fucking thing. You didn’t even back up your weird “famous people” nonsense with a story, let alone a link.

You’re directly responding to a post wherein I include stats.

It’s interesting that you fully admit to not being a doctor and that you offer no supporting stats. Sorry, did I say interesting? I meant predictable and stupid.

That’s fair. The timeline on when exactly kids stopped being interested in/trusting clowns can be fudged a fair bit. But it’s much more to your follow-up point that Pennywise as represented in the Mushyshitty adaptation is a fucking terror from the fucking jump. That adaptation obviously gets me worked up, as you can…

But you are making the most pedantic of arguments because TECHNICALLY if an artist gives permission to have their art scraped for AI training it’s TECHNICALLY not theft. Of course I don’t see you following that up by addressing a fairly commonly understood problem with that argument, which is that a lot of people sign…

And here’s where you fall into that trap and play that game. Logical positions are not *inherently* superior to emotional ones. Logos is not the superior to pathos despite your very obvious attempt to make it so. That’s not “where problems arise”. That’s where YOUR problem with those arguments arise. And that’s fine.…

About this you argue logic first, emotion never, my guy.

As you say, we’ve talked about this a lot. And you always boil it down (some would say DRAG it down) (me. i would say that) to the utility argument. Cool. I don’t give a tin shit about the utility argument. Try having this conversation without talking about commercial art.

This is some fun white hat anti-capitalism caping for selfish egomaniacal shitbird trolls to distract from victim-blaming. “Well you shouldn’t go down Hacker Alley, Miss, everyone knows that unless you have two-tier authentication you’re kinda asking for it.”

Do you know what they would likely do if a convicted pedophile told everyone that would listen that they guaranteed more child sex assaults in the future? They would very likely give that person a life sentence! You are deliberately ignoring the circumstances to make some weird point about hacking as a crime.

The article goes some length to point out that treatment and release is very much an option. I’m not sure what more you want.

Hey bud? No, YOU provide the fucking proof of “How many goddam times have we seen people murdered by mentally ill people who were released”. I’ll give you a hint as someone who has actually looked into it: the VAST majority of murderers (both individual and mass) who were *actually* diagnosed with mental illness were…

I bought Dreams thinking that it might be an opportunity to try game developing myself.

Vampires didn’t always have two fangs.

A significant difference that you are entirely ignoring is that human artists create art to be consumed by other humans. Anyone who makes art knows that they may inspire other artists. And that is acknowledged and agreed upon and even celebrated. The number of artists who DON’T want or agree to having their work…

Are you an AI? Because you sure like repeating this bullshit.

Art is a communicative process.

It’s weird because you keep saying “bad” but this article is “disappointing”. Those are two different words that create two different expectations and two different analyses.

Ah, that makes slightly more sense. Although to be fair, they actually *took* the meeting. And they don’t have to deal with anyone they don’t really want to. It’s not actually much like the LOTR fanfic guy.

Or just let someone write. He can still direct.