Welp this post became null and void.
Per the official Jalopnik definition: rear glass is there, but the roof over the cargo compartment is less than the coverage by the rear hatch (rear hatch angles into the rear. This makes it a hatchback not a wagon.
Prescription in someone’s name that doesn’t match his. Driver told “never let someone else sign for package” so follows policy trained on.
Speculating based on the limited info:
That first sentence is doing you no favors.
Same here, they are extremely helpful in snowy driving conditions!
This. Aim for 2 Star ratings...the people who will actually buy it don’t really care about the safety as it's still better than an OG MR2 or any other mid engines car from the 80s
Probably taking this comment a bit too literally and not appreciating the humor in it
There's an eerie reference to a first world country heading down this same path in your comment
A pistol is a gun.
Only a 7 speaker sound system? Fancy Kristin is definitely uninterested
The Model T was cheapish transportation (the original $825 they cost is comparable to $23k today which many people couldn’t afford) , but calling it “good” is very relative to what the other options were at the time.
Sad you can’t see where your error is and where I'm coming from, but please continue to trash talk my home state if it makes you feel better.
Yeah Carl confirmed this. It's a poorly written sentence that can be taken either way
I did and it’s poorly written as you can read it two ways, particularly since you list the Accord first which is where it is implied that’s the one with the terrible dealership.
Show us where the Acura touched you
You are implying the dealership experience at Acura is worse than at KIA????
Came that way from the factory though
Genuine snort from the Osborne reference.