nbpoaqnvm
nbpoaqnvm
nbpoaqnvm

You’re looking at a responsible person who pays in full every month who has a high utilization rate. Reason being that my credit score is actually very good, so I never realized that the only thing keeping it from being even better is a high utilization rate on my cards. I’ve been meaning to ask for a credit increase,

Doesn't Haisley ever get sick of all the flak he gets for being such a tool? It's not without merit, Billy.

  1. I don’t watch baseball.

At 0:30, that thing sounds EXACTLY like a TIE fighter!

As a Prius owner (I'm a truck guy, but I'm also practical), this makes me smile. 50mpg sure is nice.

I've got a '99 Taco. Toyota's '80s and '90s truck styling was right on point, and they are great rigs too. I see dozens of '90s Toyota trucks every week. The things just won't die!

First question. No idea. Never seen that terminology.

The second question in the video is really easy. It’s just 12*11 hidden by a convoluted question.

Third question, not really sure how he knew so quickly. I *think the answer is 30^60, but I don’t know the trick to figuring that out so quickly.

4th question is a simple

Your words were “arguing balls and strikes is not against the rules.”

Then when you were proven wrong, you changed your tune to “players do not HAVE to be ejected for arguing balls and strikes.”

Are you seriously now trying to change your argument to, “I always knew umps had the authority to eject people for arguing

Rule 9.01d

“Each umpire has the authority to disqualify any player, coach, manager, or substitute for objecting to decisions...”

Rule 9.01d

“Each umpire has the authority to disqualify any player, coach, manager or substitute for objecting to decisions...”

You didn't make it very far down the rules, did you? Players do not HAVE to be ejected for arguing balls and strikes. However, it is well within the rights of the ump to eject players for

My answer to the stark (ha!) difference in reception:

The MCU is better, so people are willing to shrug it off. Had BvS been good, no one would have cared about those killings you brought up.

As I noted above, I hate Snyder (like really, really hate), and I think MoS and BvS were awful. But the Avengers do not

I hate Snyder as much or more than the other guy, and I agree with your assessment of the stupidity of the killings in BvS, but in no way do I believe those things justify the backlash that movie universe has received for "murder" when the Avengers universe is so much worse on that front.

And no character in history has ever been changed...

At least not without the backlash of nerdy fans.

HA! Are you kidding me? Like, seriously. Are you kidding me?

Sheesh. Fanboys be fanboys.

FWIW, I enjoy both the Marvel CU and the DC movies (Marvel much more, for the most part, minus the DK trilogy). I’m not a DC homer. I’m not a Marvel (or specifically MCU homer). I am just trying to call it like it is.

In both

No, no, no. This is Marvel. Not DC. Marvel heroes don’t just straight up murder people. Captain America clearly calculated the compressive strength of that concrete and adjusted the force and angle of his kick to appropriately spare that soldier’s life. He’s Captain ‘Merica, after all. He doesn’t murder people.

/s

I

Even if Thanos does end up killing a bunch of the Avengers (I assume he will, and there will be a scene reminiscent of Tony’s death dream), I assume there will be a Days of Future Past outcome where no one actually dies, and it’s probably going to be Doctor Strange who is the catalyst for this resurrection.

In the end,

The lack of consequence or purpose for the film is precisely the reason I would rate it poorly. As a spectacle, it was fine. But if I just wanted to go see a spectacle, I might as well watch a Michael Bay film. The MCU has shown it can be so much more than a Michael Bay film. Sadly, CW was not. It was just a whole

Ajax and Eindhoven is laughable. Atletico has the same number of championships and runners-up in Champs as Liverpool during the time. Dortmund same story with a little more league success (in a two-team league). PSG plays in a one-team league and hasn’t won a UEFA cup in ages. Inter Milan? Really? They’re in the exact

Show me 10 teams that have a better 10 years than Liverpool (even this most recent 10 years, which has been 10 of the worst in Liverpool’s history). It’s not that easy to do. When some of your worst years can still compare favorably to all but a handful of teams in the world, you're a great team. The last five or six

So, history and consistency make greatness. Liverpool has both of those things. Therefore Liverpool is... not great?

You’re making a lot of sense.

Here are the facts. Liverpool is a great club. Liverpool has had about a decade of incredible highs and lows which would mostly be considered a disappointment for supporters.