Seems like a good price for a car that can be run for a while, even if it is a BMW.

Ventilation should take care of most, rather than overpoweringly scented chemicals that people might be allergic to. Hell, you could even run charcoal filters to remove the scent of death.

Exactement!

I am someone who can tell the tech is not there, despite the rendered photos and even if they had mocked up a “real” thing. The software and hardware for self-driving is not there. At best, we are talking level 3, and even that has degrees.

LOL, yes, but this is not a level 5 vehicle. That’s the thing: “Hey, let’s show a vision of the feature by mocking up (rendering) a “full self-driving” design when the tech at most is level 3".

Yet, all photos are rendering, and as self-driving level 5 does not exist, and you can’t simply mechanically engineer it, it doesn’t exist, regardless of how great the prototype mockup is.

Yeah, no.

Terrifying failure mode.

1) the tech is not there

This car, although it looks fun, always gives me the willies. The reason is that if the fans, running at 20k or something, would pick up a stone or metal piece from the road, it will turn ugly really, really fast. It scares the shit out of me just thinking about it.

Renderings of how they’d like to be able to do things. This is not real. Hell, it’s as real as most renderings of a fantasy future: Not at all.

I am so over hyper cars. It took some years (decades) to realise, but I fail to get excited about cars that will only be sold to people who will never drive them.

They had to sue?

No, from a purely aesthetic standpoint, a mirror finish does not look better. Yes, it’s more work, but “shinier” does not equal “better” from a “purely aesthetic standpoint”. Of course, your aesthetics are likely different from mine.

Nah, lidar and radar works fine with this.

Oh, they certainly made an effort to be different (and garish), hence the whole tourbillon watch theme and the utter garishness of the thing.

Not only does it look worse, and be difficult to see (and blinding) for other motorists, but pedestrians will have a harder time seeing this soon-to-be killer vehicle.

I think they disregarded function and made a decision that was form over function. Just like the CT is disregarding function at every turn, I think Bugatti got carried away in an effort to be “different” in the effort to be able to sell a $4 million car.

you pull it out to start the motor. Unlike a Duesenberg SSJ, it’s made of crystal and aluminum. Also unlike a Duesenberg SSJ, you push it in to stop.

That’s good on all fronts.