Wow, that’s a lot of typos. I should stop posting quick comments from my phone for sure.

I haven’t used a mouse for more than two decades. But I get your point.

Thebreason the top fits is because they had some chinese company make them. Not sure I wpuæd trust the lid to not leach chemicals, though. Cheapest bidder and all.

SO no green? Safely pass on starboard is dead, apparently.

Morgan launched their Speedster in 2014. So, a decade after a small English company.

Sheesh at 3rd gear.

Seems a lot of faff. I’d buy something not metallic, or have it painted in a light colour.

The board members are fully on the side of the terrorist, to the extent that they made a video imploring shareholders to go along with the bonker’s idea of giving Musk a payday larger than all the profits ever made by Tesla.

Because the board have drunk the cool-aid. So much so, they recently made a video begging the shareholders to approve paying Musk the 53 billion.

Isn’t that the company who thought hub motors and the associated unsprung weight was a good idea?

What’s the point of EVs like this? Electric bro dozers that will never see anything off-roady? If it was a hybrid, maybe at least some would take it on trips at least on dirt roads (think “rally”).

[...]warned that the measures may be too little, too late.

“eager to inject your own angst that you ASSumed”

That high speed chase must have been oh-so necessary, considering how dangerous they are. It’s amazing that that was not endangering bystanders enough, so they of course had to stop it to literally attack a bystander.

after plugging into ground electrical power.

They are subpar in that they don’t last long, and they are unable to deorbit as he claimed they would if they got off course or otherwise failed.

Oh, if the fraudster says it isn’t true, then it can’t possibly.

That post of yours is a great example of the confusion and fraudulent naming from Tesla: FSD is not actual full self driving. It’s a poorly working level 2 driving aid. That’s the level. And one of the reasons it works so poorly is that it relies solely on (cheap) cameras. Software wise it’s also bad, the way it…

Ah, yes, Teslastans also raves about the Cybertruck. Doesn’t change the fact that Starlink is an unviable scam using sub par hardware, which requires enormous amounts of pollution both in the atmosphere and in orbit.

No it is not. Not only is it not economically viable and never will be, the hardware is shit, needing constant replacements, but the liftoffs pollute like hell, and the satellites pollutes in space.