And Musk should be careful what he wishes for. The answer to “what’s the best car” is NEVER “Tesla”.

Unless you want to just have it in garage or trailer it to a track, even small speed bumps would wreak havoc on that long snout so close to the ground.

Werner Von BRaun was a great rocket scientist, but saying that Musk is a “capable technical CEO” is just not true, regardless of what you put around that statement.

Yes, and countries with low birth rates in need of workers can short-term open up for migration. Low birth rates are only a problem if you exclude people from the rest of the world.

A portmanteu of “bleh” and “Beyoncé”, so a poor copy of the real thing. That must be it, surely.

He’s a very, very capable technical CEO,

Indeed.

Usually, though, trunks and frunks don’t have 90 degree sharp stainless edges/corners.

That wasn’t my point. My point was that Nissan have been in the “offroad game” for decades - more than 70 years - and are not newcomers to offroad vehicles as the article says. Whether or not you like the size or not, or what it competes with is irrelevant to whether or not they have been making offroaders since mid…

I wasn’t sure what it was called outside Europe, so I found Nissan’s global site where it says “Nissan Patrol/Armada”, so, yes, it’s the same vehicle.

Nissan wants in on the offroad market?

Didn’t PWC dabble in money laundering a while back?

I came for comparison (as the headline suggested I should), only to realise I don’t really care about supercar logos one way or the other.

That is why we say someone got a Darwin award, as a person who dies before he/she had offspring are not able to propagate their genes.

I fully understand Darwinism

Yes, you can have a larger windowed roof if you ditch the rear window. I agree with that. What I am saying is that there is no reason to. There is nothing in the shape of the car that precludes a rear window, and it certainly doesn’t make the interior bigger. That is certainly only you thinking that.

Ok, let me quote you, as this is what you said (that because they could reproduce, then Darwinism couldn’t possibly be in play. I am not sure I can dumb this down any further. Oh, and the question was rhetorical, as despite you trying to show your prowess in that post, it shows you don’t actually know much.

Hmm, seems like you wouldn’t need such a big pano roof if you designed it with a rear window, and as for space: You could have designed the car with a more vertical hatch.

Before this electric crossover coupe, the only way to get a car sans rear glass was to go for a high-end supercar.

Do you have any reason to think that people have already propagated their genes from when they are sexually mature and not yet have had any children?