I fully understand Darwinism

Yes, you can have a larger windowed roof if you ditch the rear window. I agree with that. What I am saying is that there is no reason to. There is nothing in the shape of the car that precludes a rear window, and it certainly doesn’t make the interior bigger. That is certainly only you thinking that.

Ok, let me quote you, as this is what you said (that because they could reproduce, then Darwinism couldn’t possibly be in play. I am not sure I can dumb this down any further. Oh, and the question was rhetorical, as despite you trying to show your prowess in that post, it shows you don’t actually know much.

Hmm, seems like you wouldn’t need such a big pano roof if you designed it with a rear window, and as for space: You could have designed the car with a more vertical hatch.

Before this electric crossover coupe, the only way to get a car sans rear glass was to go for a high-end supercar.

Do you have any reason to think that people have already propagated their genes from when they are sexually mature and not yet have had any children?

Well, if we go by what he said, yes, my knowledge about evolution and that you have to have offspring in order to propagate your genes, is indeed more valid than his. Him, on the other hand, first claims he knows about evolution, and then in the next sentence showing that he thinks evolution can happen without…

It’s just that you said it was woven. If only textured, yes, keeping it clean will not be a problem. It’s still hideous, though.

I don’t even like the look of actual carbon fiber, despite me having a leg, tent poles, rowing boat, and several other items made from the stuff. But fake carbon fiber? No fucking way.

I know he said that at the end. But his second claim, after claiming that Darwinism is grossly misused, he argued that darwinism couldn’t be a factor the moment people can reproduce, showing that he does not have the slightest understanding of Darwinism and what is called a “Darwin Award”. The fact that he thinks that…

Yes, at some time in their life. They rarely have kids the moment they can drive.

I like how you say that Darwinism is “grossly misused” while simultanously not getting it at all.

I am. I always carry the anti-tiger rock - except when in the zoo, because I want to see the tiger. If I carry my rock, I won’t be able to. You see, I’m that clever.

Well, it’s better than killing someone to eat them. Unless he get’s a taste for it, then it will be the next step.

I guess if you’re in the US, you then don’t want to go more offroad than dedicated trails and some (parts) of national parks.

Yes, that number is probably really small. But then again, Danes posting here is probably a small number. Yet, here I am, posting from Denmark.

Technically, it didn’t get in orbit, as it didn’t have enough speed.

The rear is much, much worse.

It could be true. There are people living in Iraq.

I know this is about the lease, but that rear end!