Also, tracking just the NYT is part of the problem. Sure, people look forward to their longer, interesting profiles of important athletes, but it's not really a barometer at all of anything significant in the sports world. ESPN and twitter would be more appropriate—it still wouldn't be equal, particularly if you're…

My understanding has always been that a rough definition of sexism is attributing negative or untrue qualities to a female simply because she's a female. When it comes to sports, most people don't think that it's sexist to realistically acknowledge that men and women are physically different and, especially given…

Hey authors,

I love women's sports, and I think a lot of the responses the Scoreboard for Equality and this article will get (men's sports are more interesting, no one likes women's sports, etc.) are dumb, but I also think it's hard to fault journalists for the disparity.

Ohhhhhhh. I didn't get the clicking part. That explains it. Thanks.

And Los Angeles residents were so sure that they would never hear on Vine again about a Brown murdered by a sports star after being involved in domestic abuse.

The point of the article is supposed to be that there is more outrage over racism than racism. I agree that the linked sites support that idea. That part isn't what I'm questioning. The part I'm questioning is where the article tells us to look at these tweets as further proof that more outrage exists than racism, but…

I'm confused... the story makes it sound like you're saying that there are more people upset about the racist / homophobic tweets than there are people making racist / homophobic tweets. And that the selected tweets are going to be people who are outraged by the racist / homophobic tweets. But unless I'm missing…

"I thanked him, and we walked back into the arena together. He left with his team. And I took off my North Korea pin."

Jesus, how many stories about bulging addicts can Gawker get out of that plane ticket to Toronto?

Nice to see Tucuman sticking up for its best friend.

No funny comment, just stating that this is the perfect fanbase to troll with this. You can't even glance at someone's crisp, new Natitude shirt without a "What! I've been to 50+ games every season!" eruption. Those people, ugh.

So sketchy-ass guy holds information that could get someone very important in a lot of trouble. No reasonable person wants to give sketchy-ass guy any money, because of what it represents. Along comes a large organization claiming to need the information so badly that it is willing to pay. Reasonable people are…

There's nothing passive about how regressive you are when it comes to freeze pops, but I like you anyway.

Listen, when I have to feed myself, I buy store-brand everything. I think I'm pretty objective regarding when store-brand is not just cheaper, but better. (Like Kroger Greek Yogurt, which is the best on the market). There is just no parallel universe that will ever exist where any brand is better than Fla Vor Ice, no…

I didn't eat a freeze pop for two years once because my parents bought an off-brand box. There wasn't enough freezer space for me to buy another box of the good stuff, and I couldn't get rid of the off-brand pops. I sure as hell wasn't going to eat them—why are they the size of an enchilada and why do they taste like…

You gotta tear that shit off with your teeth, son.

Sometimes I don't feel qualified to comment on articles, but I am a fucking expert in pop ice (Fla Vor Ice being the only brand worth discussing).

Underrated comment.+1

Yeah... I had trouble handling it last night, as I watched the scores update. Maybe it would be easier if I could watch on TV, so I could understand it, but wow.