perfectly stated!

As there is no written law to back up the judges order (Utah has no ban on homosexuals adopting or fostering), it would seem there should be an immediate way to have this ruling revoked without removing the child. But what would seem easy is likely a legal logistical nightmare.

Time to accept that you may be colorblind and just move on.

Thanksgiving is one of the biggest shopping days? Get a life people.

Generally I skip most posted videos, but this one I watched. Well done and very worth the time.

Agreed

The GOP are making abortion legally illegal. Its just fucking wrong…and they are laughing at getting away with it.

Ahhh, that $28 Pureology candy smell pays off.

She’s Gotta Have It is still one of my favorite of his films.

Sorry folks, but this is a fictional play simply using a real world person. I would prefer that the actual production be judged and not just the notion of which race portrayed which character. Could it go horribly wrong, absolutely and should be judged as such. Could it also offer a twist to the story (as this…

The writing is a fictional depiction of events…so no, its not a historically accurate play.

perhaps because they simply sucked at it?

The photo doesn't suggest getting a silly laugh out of getting another tipsy… the photo is a seriously creepy torture porn movie ad.

If banning it helps put an end to all the f’ing non-stop commercials for the sites, then yeah and thanks!

Its going to take until 2017 to “phase out” the orca show? Did the orca union have some sort of binding contract Sea world had to honor or were they just hoping that in two years the shit storm would pass them by?

So his failed leadership simply lands him into another University job as research coordinator? Yeah, that school has issues.

50 Shades of Blue?

Its kind of like some (not all obviously) kids that win school science fairs based off the work of the parents. The dad seemed to have everything pre-programmed for this toddler.

The government isn’t interfering with his rights to use the name, say the name or do anything he wants with the name. The government is simply stating that they aren’t going to allow the team exclusive rights with a government seal. Again, not denying free speech or anything related to the first amendment. You’ll have…

The government isn’t interfering or providing pressure to do anything. He is asking the government to provide trademark protection…denying him that does not interfere with any of his first amendment rights. You really need to get a better understanding of what exactly free speech means.