natureslayer
natureslayer
natureslayer

Pretty sure that the same (liberal) people decrying Biden’s sundowning also have issues with Trump’s sundowning. Who is the “we” in your first statement? And it also seems like just because Trump’s been given a pass by Republicans, dems should do the same with Biden?

Except at no time does he say Pete isn’t gay or that he’s the wrong kind of gay. He’s saying that Pete’s own words are what’s denigrating the non-assimilationist queers by focusing on “normal” family life as if normal is ideal or should be emulated. No one is ever fucking saying Pete isn’t gay. Stop that shitty straw

Pete has 0 experience. He’s terrible

Saw a preview of this before Lady of a Portrait of Fire (AMAZING). One of the tag lines was “a movie for our era” and that this is a true story from 1996. What does that say about our era that white supremacy redemption is the movie for it...

Is that expensive for concert tickets though for a well-known band?

This man can do it all: play a dog, play an ape, and legalize your documents for a small fee

Oh hey, it’s Gargasmell again posting sentences out of context and removing the latter half of the whole fucking sentence that actually undermines his whole entire point. You’re the worst. Go away. your schtick is tiresome.

To me she’s Lorde but nihilistic, and I’m more of a melodrama sad boi than I am Gen Z absurdism. I liked two of her songs on her album, but the rest were eh

Yep, that’s Billie Eilish over a James Bond theme. It’s uhh... fine? Kind of karaoke-y?

But that’s also not what the review says (your use of quotes is a paraphrase, but you also said I took you Too literally sooooo make up your mind?). He didn’t say that tame impala makes him cringe. Just that some of the lyrics are cringey. If you’re coming to the first listen loving everything TI did, you’re also not

Not quite sure why you’d want detached objectivity in a review (or really what that would look like? This song has 120 beats per minute. This one is in a 3/4 time signature. Yaaay). If anything, knowing what the reviewer likes and doesn’t like provides a better service (if using music reviews as a purchasing guide).

Oh fuuuuuuck off, they’re the hipsters in the bar? Do people still talk and complain about hipsters? Are you stuck in 2008? Enjoyable on its own terms? Dude, you can like a movie and still let other people dislike films without saying that they’re pretentious. Or assuming that you have the true and correct opinion

Don’t read them? You can skip those parts. They’re even sectioned off!

Now we just need gargasmell

Which part of this is a hot take? It’s a Holocaust drama inside of a broad satire. That’s just a factual description of the movie. Neither one is that great. How is that a hot take? Is anything that’s not relentlessly positive a hot take?

Enlightened?

Lemme guess. You’re straight. That’s why you think Bowen is being stereotypical and not like himself. 

Was that implied? I don’t think she’d disagree that McDonalds was the only one

Someone used the word structural! That means it’s meaningless!

Not really. Makes perfect sense. Lemme Break it down: