Adding more BIPOC absolutely does not need to be justified, but it shouldn’t be done just by changing skins of current characters.

MMO’s live in a weird space where they are both living worlds and extremely static at the same time. That means that when you make changes players expect pretty explicit rationale, because…

The scammers don’t pay for them though - it wouldn’t matter if they cost $500 per key.

Very simplified: They’re thieves. They buy the keys with stolen credit card info, and by the time the owner gets the card blocked and the chargeback happens, the key is sold and used.... and the devs are stuck with the chargeback and…

Thanks for the save, Zack. Appreciate it.
Gonna drop some dollars on The Ascent this week instead I think.

It is never enough, because once you’re beyond need and even reasonable want, the money becomes just a high score.
You could say “the sky is the limit” but even that is false, as we have very recently seen.

The sad truth is that the avarice of the wealthy knows no bounds.

I don’t know enough about HS details to say which is “worse” but even accepting that statement, that’s really even more damning of an argument against these changes.
MtG already has a lot of RNG, and as you mention it has some that HS doesn’t have. That means that layering even more/HS RNG on top threatens to…

Get rid of Guillemots. As long as they’re in charge, the cancer will stay.
If they’re out, there’s at least a CHANCE of redemption.

Until then, I stay away from Ubisoft titles.

Good. Now they can poke Bethesda (and others) to re-enable achievements when mods are on.

1) You can mod it to re-enable them anyway, so not much point.
2) Nobody in the universe other than you gives two shits about your cheevos anyway, so why bother disabling them in the first place.
3) It’s not like you can’t cheat…

I’m sorry? I must’ve misunderstood. In which context is the US “the oldest country outside of fake countries like San Marino” exactly? Only in the context of forces actively present in those two countries at the time of setting up base, or?
There’s something I’m missing in that statement, because you cannot be saying th…

So here’s the thing: Yeah there are a lot of “unhelpful” user reviews, but that’s why we don’t just read ONE and call it a day. They’re not used, at least by me, as one review by my favourite outlet.

I glance at maybe 50+ reviews (both types, but most positives) of a game on Steam - that usually weeds out the individual…