nathan-baker
GnatB
nathan-baker

In the case of highway ramp speeds and some speed limits in general around here, it’s like the speeds are set for fully loaded 18 wheelers driving in bad weather.

Which at least means the right lane won’t be “fresh snow” whenever it’s snowing.

That’s the (funny?) part. The neighborhoods ARE instanced. There’s just a cap of 12 instances.

Thing is, the individual wards are, essentially, instanced. There’s just a hard limit of 12 of them. (IIRC the initial introduction to the system said that if the wards got full they would simply add additional ones, I wasn’t playing then though, so no idea if they did start with less and simply capped out wards at

I didn’t say ban. I said regulated as gambling. Because it is. And there are a lot of things trading cards do to avoid running afoul of gambling laws that loot boxes rarely do.

Interesting, I used to live in Chicago. The place I worked at moved from the suburbs to downtown, and my new route included 94 to 90 to W. Ohio, which is about half of that i-90, from Harlem to exit 56b mentioned as coming in #5.

I don’t see how he comes out looking... not awful. He has knowledge a powerful director is sexually harassing aspiring actresses, and his response is to merely tell him to lay off his (at the time) girlfriend? So far with the possible exception of Matt Damon & Russel Crow (if those allegations are true) he comes out

I believe that gambling is morally wrong, therefor:

Battery. The drink actually connected. Fine up to $2000, and/or 6 months in jail.

I assume the police have looked into this battery, as there would appear to be video evidence?

Yes? It’s pretty much in the title of your article. “When you’re put up against a wall, you’re going to speak out.”

I’m not sure Bill Gates would agree with you.

Interesting... Not sure if many noticed, but apparently Paltrow just threw Pitt under the bus. In the linked article she makes it clear that she mentioned her harassment to Pitt, who then confronted Weinstein. So *he* presumably, knew. And other than confronting Weinstein, did nothing.

Uhm...

I’m sorry, but I have to disagree with the “act of bravery” angle. It’s not an act of bravery when a cornered rat turns around and fights back, it’s an act of desperation, with nothing left to lose.

Why? I’m curious why anybody is upset that people who worked with a guy X number of years ago failed to be the first people to head to the town square, pick up stones, and throw ‘em at the guy.

Which is a large part of the argument of the people who boycotted the most recent PR referendum. The question was phrased as to whether to stop being a colony. They don’t consider PR a colony, so boycotted the referendum.

IIRC the various recent PR referendum’s have all been (allegedly) poorly worded.

To be fair, just because somebody says to a friend (or group of friends) that they find a coworker extremely attractive doesn’t mean they plan to, or are, sexually harassing him/her. Meeting your future spouse at work is fairly common, and presumably it starts with attraction.

Sorry, no. Being held back doesn’t sink a career. Not getting a promotion is infinitely better than being fired for alleged harassment.