naravara-old
NaraVara
naravara-old

@D.Crane: THERE AIN'T NO MONORAIL AND THERE NEVER WAS!

The Eldar and the Protoss in Warhammer 40k and Starcraft respectively both basically use magic.

So if he's going to be posting pictures of O'Donnell and publishing lurid details about her unmentionable areas, you'd think he'd at least have the balls to not crop himself out of the pics and reveal himself no?

@黒人: $30? WHERE!?

@Frazzle Snazzle Bleeble Blabble: I like the 360 controller for everything except gripability. The PS3 analog stick is really grippy while it slides on the 360. On the other hand, the 360 analog stick feels tighter and more precise while the PS3s feels like it's all floaty. I have no tactile feedback for how much I've

@yantelope: . . .I do. I pretty much restrict myself to RTSes on PC though.

@saltboy: This. People need to understand the reserves aren't fixed. New estimates come out all the time as new sites are explored and discovered.

@yantelope: It's less profit than you would have made otherwise. Let's say there are a bunch of people with both PCs and 360s. They can buy the PC version for $10 or the 360 version for $25. Which would you rather they buy?

@yantelope: Simple. PC games don’t hold their value as well. Mass Effect 2 for the 360 is still selling for about $25-$30. On the PC it’s down to like, $10 or $15. When you release a game on the PC you now have to price to compete with piracy as well as everything else. The margins are much lower, so expect to see

@linfosoma: You won’t have to. A lot of PC developers have a windshield perspective on pricing. The reason I don’t pay $50 for a AAA PC game is because I don’t want to pay the additional $400 for a computer capable of playing it at decent settings. It’s not surprising that the developer of Crysis, of all things, fails

@reducks: I really don't see their current laptops being "SO" much more expensive. Depending on the model the premium ranges from $50 to $200 over a PC with comparable features (including the screen.) And that's easily explainable by custom features like the better designed Mac OS X and the quality design of the

@Poopiter - The Gas Giant: I ask this out of genuine curiosity. What's the issue with the isometric view and what alternative view would you prefer?

@GhostWhoWalks: Is it just me or have they made the monk a lot skinnier than before? When I first saw him the model seemed to look hefty and muscle-bound like someone out of 300. Now the model looks kind of like a young Dalai Lama.

@Settings: Do you keep your laptop in your bedroom?

@916CALLTURK: The optimus thing is nice, but it has some issues. There are some cases where it just doesn't turn on when you expect it to. Starcraft 2, for instance, wasn't running off the GPU at first. I think they patched it later.

@CVDon: Like Ari said. Utility is not the same as quality. Subjective evaluations of how much you like something aren't the same thing as that object's effectiveness.

@tomsomething: Obviously not enough money for upkeep on hiring more people to do the pre-approval.

@tomsomething: But then Apple would get swamped with a million and one tentative app requests. The idea is that you need to have something at stake before you try. Otherwise the App store becomes amateur hour. It's bad enough as it is even with the impediments in place. I don't imagine we're missing out on much

@CVDon: Sorry chief. But relativism in general is a philosophically bankrupt position. But relativism with respect to actual tangible things is really stretching the bounds of logic and reason.

@tomsomething: "When rejecting the app, Apple cited something about mimicking the existing interface. "