There is no physical evidence that Brendan Dassey committed a crime. They found deer blood in the garage, but no trace of human blood there, or any blood or DNA in Avery's house.

Yeah, like there was no way a jury would convict Avery of a crime that Gregory Allen committed! Oh wait…

Believing that Dassey has knowledgeable involvement requires using confirmation bias equal to that of moon landing hoaxers. So Sherry Culhane, the same woman who contaminated DNA samples, found no DNA on Dassey's jeans. -There is no physical evidence that a crime occured in the garage.

"I think Brendan had a hand in it but was forced to help becaus he admitted he had been molested and beaten by Avery and was scared of him."

Like I said, he may not have "knowingly" helped him. Honestly, if Avery is the killer, it would make sense to use Dassey for some jobs knowing that he's too dense to comprehend exactly what he's doing. We know for a fact that Dassey didn't stab and rape the girl in Avery's trailer while she was chained to the bed. It…

I've noticed that too. One thing I took away from the series and further reading was that if Avery did it, it didn't happen in his house or garage, and it seems almost totally implausible that Dassey "helped" or participated that day. I don't think he participated at all, at least knowingly.

That's what makes me sick. They already had Avery convicted before the Dassey trial. The prosecution could have said something to the effect that they weren't comfortable with conflicting testimony/lack of evidence to go through a trial and offered a plea of something like 5 years for interfering/obstruction or…