I always think he has Londo hair

Hey Tim, typically when people click on an article, they expect the questions begged by the headline to be answered by the article. That’s how it typically works. Your glib response shows you’re missing the point.

I have to agree with the criticism largely: on kotaku I expect the headline to be answered in the article, even if it’s about a video or podcast. Your comment here is exactly what I came looking for - because I want to watch, but I can’t for at least 16 hours.

I have to agree with some of the criticisms, re: presentation that you’re getting here. While it’s super interesting to follow what you’re doing, and I full-well understand that you’re using Kotaku to promote your YouTube series—because, let’s be honest: this is a YT series being advertised through Kotaku—the fact…

This article is the definition of click bait. Title references a difference between the two versions of the game, but when we get to the article we aren’t actually told what the difference is, but instead are told to go watch a video. Any news article that requires me to watch a video without explicitly saying so in…

Funny thing, that although you didn’t take it out of context, you completely misinterpreted my exaggeration.

You write a title that refers to some FF7 trivia. You write 3 paragraphs about the same video. But it all serves as an advertisement for the video itself since you don’t spill the beans on what even you believe…

Agreeing with the other commenters. I clicked on the article to find out what was up with Barret’s gun arm, not to be directed to a 20-minute video somewhere else. This kind of thing is better linked to social media straight from YouTube, not dressed up as a Kotaku.com article, which turned out not to be an article…

Sooo a Kotaku article that’s blatent click-baitisement for a 20min video? I thought the point of an article with a title like “You won’t believe the reason they gave for Barret losing his arm on the japanese version” was to actually TELL US what the reason is, instead of using it as a plug for a 20 minutes lets play.…

You know what, the majority of people who are posting that probably have other shit going on in their lives. A favorite celebrity death can feel especially hard when other things are also going wrong in your life and in the lives of those around you, like a straw that broke the camel’s back. But even if that is the…

“It’s a good year for me, so fuck you if it’s not the case for you”

I know you’re joking, but that line delivered even in Firefly bothered me: even lightheartedly I have a hard time equating talking in movies to child molestation.

2016 can go to a very special level of Hell. A level they reserve for child molesters and people who talk at the theater.