Not that anyone here will understand but there are plenty of carbon neutral NFTs. Taking a hard stance and not being open to innovation is not a great way to succeed. Blockchain has its benefits, completely being close minded just creates bigots. 

So you’re saying it’s around 63% Barsanti?

Mostly his readers.

Elie Kemper would like a word…

Shows what you know. This author holds only disdain for everything.

“Disdain for the material” is AV Club’s house style.

Actually, this might be the least-douchiest thing he’s ever written. Completely inessential and pointless, sure, but on the obnoxiousness scale, this really only gets maybe four or five out of ten possible Barsantis.

This is peak Barsanti, shut the website down, it can’t get any worse.

Ahh, a non-news story that admits as much and also sounds like it was written by someone who holds only disdain for the material referenced. Gotcha.

The president making 400K is not a good example.

EXCLUSIVE!

Calm down. This is just the usual promotional emails stuff. Many, many games do this if you check the box of “receive promotional emails” on their websites. No one is receiving this without their consent. Chillax.

Right! The Curator is an asshole and revels in it, if he disapproves of something, you’re probably on the right track.

It’s like an anger/callout addiction.  If there isn’t someone or some company to write something scathingly hateful about, something needs to be found for “the fix.”  I don’t know when it started. It must have been gradual, because I don’t remember it being like this before. Yes there were critical articles, but for re…

Especially considering the fact that the Curator’s role in the last two games has been to pop up occasionally to go “oooooh, you fucked up!” no matter what you’ve done. Even when nobody died, the Curator’s dialogue is always a sarcastic “well, you made the choices you wanted to. I hope it all pays off for you… it…

This websites disdain for video games and video game companies is just shocking, given it is a video game site.  Read that article again…Is that really a measured reaction to a company providing you playing statistics, and encouraging you to come back?  No wonder it is dying.

The Kotaku writers are really scraping the bottom of the barrel with this one. It must be a slow news day or something. To think that something so inoffensive deserves such a vitriolic response . . incredible!

I think there’s a difference between “the Curator, a character created by the devs, disapproves of my decisions” and “the devs disapprove of my decisions.”

You are going to get smashed in these comments, but you are not incorrect. Because companies are bad, it’s ok to steal their property is the general agreed upon belief. Because everyone is entitled to play 20-40 year old games that aren’t available legally any more.

The amount of piracy promoting this site has done recently is embarrassing.