What?! I thought there was a Man in the Moon! I took a bite out of it for nothing!

That may get cleared up as the it gets listed, but is an obvious question. Is the dealer selling it to get their money back plus some publicity and all profit goes to charity? Or are they going to donate some school supplies? Or is Charity the name of the sales manager’s mistress?

Somebody has been snorting to much of that white moon dust. ND

A “portion” going to “charity”? I need more “clarity”. If it like your typical DJT grift, maybe 5%. ND and not special enough. If the car itself had gone to the moon and back - OK.

In one article you have convinced me that there is in fact a bubble and the stock market will crash.

General safety note. Large objects appear to be moving slower than they actually are. I’m sure someone can go into the science behind how the human brain/eye combination makes this mistake, but it does.

I feel like the thick dust on the dashboard--that the seller has decided to feature instead of just wiping a rag across it--might say a lot about how much care has gone into maintaining this car.  That plus the broken piece of I don’t know what and a pair of old underwear (?) under the driver’s seat.

Look, just because she used to go out with Manti Te’o it doesn’t mean she’s not real.

Well let’s see. I’ll get ‘em started off:

“a technical violation of NLRA”

Also known as “a violation of NLRA.”

Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article, specifically the last three paragraphs

It shocks me the number of people who are (or at least act) utterly ignorant of Labor History. Crossing a picket line got you injured. There was violence. People died. Senator Scott is more than welcome to repeal the NLRA if he thinks he can, but it’s the law of the land, which I believe he took an oath to uphold.…

It’s because it’s a blanket statement (not just relevant to UAW workers) and sends a message to his own employees that they can be fired (i.e., retaliated against) if they attempt to exert their federally-protected rights. 

The article outlined it very plainly. He does have people working for him, who do have a legal right to unionize. How likely is it that campaign workers want to unionize? Not much, but they still have the right, and this language violates that right.

It’s just pandering to the mouth-breathing dolts that would vote for someone like him. He knows full well it’s not possible. 

Amazing that an instructor who relies on scared people to pay his salary would spread stories of how scary and dangerous the world is.

It’s more likely that they missed it completely.

Right like get the wheels JUST off the ground and shake test that bitch.  Doesn’t even matter what car if your walking under it be real fucking sure it isn’t going anywhere.

Always shake test close to the ground.