mzissou
dsoundso
mzissou

Congratulations! You seem to have missed her point entirely. She’s trying to use her position of privilege, which she openly acknowledges above, to highlight the issue all women face. You talk about her privilege as if it can only be evil, as if using that word shuts down any point she is trying to make and any change

Yes, for regular women it is an issue and one that is long overdue a resolution. But I could care less about rich people. The mistake is that people think that helping poor old Ms. Lawrence will bring more attention to the issue and help women in general. It won’t.

And as the new film “Concussion”, and many doctors and sports figures have struggled to point out for years, famous players have at best a handful of years to make their money and get their franchise opportunities, all the while dealing with injuries and head trauma (in high impact sports.) One blown knee and all that

Yeah. I’m excited for the day women can all be like:

I think so. Especially if they are talking about social issues. A lot of people think actors/celebrities should just shut up and do their jobs and be pretty. They shouldn’t speak up because who cares about what they have to say?

I was thinking that it looks good on him. It does remind how he has not been seen for a long time since this mess started with Konami.

No, I’m sorry, that is simply not true about Germany (German person who is a Germanistik scholar here.) You use Heinrich Himmler as an example; he was already a member of the Nazi Party, which was already quite brazen, in 1923, and a member of the (also already very active and visible) SS by 1926...so, yes, there was


I think there is some value on biography because it reminds us that they could be just like us and reminds us to be mindful. In the beginning Himmler was just a weird little geeky kid with a passion for big picture issues, order and making the world a better place. I was/am the same. He thought the world would be a

This is simply not true. People do things for reasons we can explain, if we’re willing to wade through the work of doing so.

YES. When I teach about the Civil War my students often ask me about why the KKK has the institutional hierarchy and naming that it does, like why it chose “Grand Wizard,” “dragons,” “klavern,” etc. for their titles. In my mind they’re just bunch of white terrorists who created that mythology to justify their racism

The game of course doesn’t completely look like an oil painting, but as someone mentioned in the comments, it’s still one of the game that looks the most like its concept arts. It’s worth playing only for the freedom, art, and themes even if you’re not into the story itself.

Allright now we need everyone in China to do this, problem solved in no time, and we’ll have smog bricks to build with!

Photoshop? Screw Photoshop. This is how you deal with it:

Wrong place wrong time. Would you sprout out these lines in the middle of a physics lecture?

Really it’s the removal or the trimming down of the RPG mechanics and what you would expect/want to find in other games of its ilk. Even comparing it to the previous New Vegas and 3.

Why can’t it just be my opinion and how I feel about the game after having played it for 42 hours and found it wanting?

Don't cut yourself on all that edge.

OR here’s a crazy idea:

yeah but how many of the people who spent ~thousands of hours~ on the original game are seeing any of the new revenue?

Or they could just offer us the ps2 classics we already paid for on ps3.