This show reminded me more of a fucked up The Nanny than it did a Disney channel tv show from the 90s.

Most of these issues would be resolved if we did away with corporations.

I think the content of this article is incredibly misguided, and rearing its sneering, privileged face at a really sensitive time. Feels like it's making light of a pretty serious situation. I didn't need proof that white writers for Gawker media were racially insensitive twits, but c'mon.

Sorry about the unfounded insult.

So why exactly should I take the words of some dipshit blogger over the words of a well researched and cited article?

I suspect one of the big issues developers are having with FF XV is debugging the open world. Which means they're running around trying to make sure the game won't freeze, a common occurrence in American sandbox-style rpgs, but it seems there's a host of other issues they have to contend with as well. I suppose I'd be…

I didn't even realize they were two separate people... weird.

It's sad that people who have access to universities like Yale, Harvard, Berkeley, etc. aren't even the best or brightest people in our country. Sometimes one slips through, but for the most part the institutions that seem to churn out the leadership class, among others, in this country are overwhelmed with effete,…

Sometimes I envy the right. They don't in-fight nearly as much as the left does. For a bunch that hate collectivism, they sure do think collectively.

Clearly the better alternative is to do nothing and continue to allow Indian women to be raped in a country with the highest incidence of rape in the world.

93 women in India are raped everyday.

You're realism isn't grounded in even the smallest shred of material reality. We live in a consumer driven market-based economy. You aren't a realist, you're a text book liberal, all ideas, and nothing real at all. Because the IDEA of this bothers you, the possibility for it to impact someone's material existence is…

Thgis article is seriously bull shit. You can censor and delete all the comments you don't like, but it won't be longh before some other publication skewers you for this shallow criticism.

And idle and talk about Kim Kardashian... western feminism at its best here.

No making them work in the sex trade is. Great logic you got there.

Here's the difference between these entrepreneurs and you: they're giving these women an option outside of sex work, and you're bitching about the sincerity of that option on a blog. Seriously are these shallow, consumerist observations steeped in anything addressing the material realities these women exist in?

I would assume its because it gives unskilled laborers (these women) a job, probably in manufacturing the clothes, that gets them off the rape laden streets of India.

"Do I feel bad printing this email here? A little. But as soon as any feelings of shame start creeping up, I remind myself I'm not a white woman who went with a Christian charity/Christian Mission to India in 2005 and was so horrified by human trafficking that I decided to start a company called Punjammies..."

Nanomachine based medical technology. Ghost in the Shell: SAC outlined it best: big pharma would fuck us.

This definitely seems like much more of a Western issue to me. It's why Macross got dissolved and rescripted into Robotech. Something about the western mind-set begs continuity and I wonder how much of it has to do with the narrative influences in our culture from this canon: