They were in the fault for trying to be cute about changing something that worked for 70 years.

One thing is always certain - people will make mistakes. Manufacturers have a duty to make sure, within reason, that those mistakes won’t kill people.

You're a piece of garbage. If you really believe any of this.

That isn’t how products liability works. It isn’t all, well, the user should have been more attentive, so sucks to be that guy. Why? Because it shifts the responsibility from a corporation that could have done better and has the resources to do so to a poor dead or mangled SOB.

You know those pidgeys you don't want to bother with are the best way to level up.

Sorry but once again you’re giving Caucasians waaaaay too much credit. Since Ancient times from 3000bc; the “civilised majority” of Han Chinese and their ancestors who were generally pale have seen the darker skin natives of Western China and the nomadic people to the North as uncivilised barbarians. There was logic…

why do folks act like rehoming a pet is like THE WORST most HEINOUS thing a human can do? Come off it, y’all act like folks are evil Hitlers. Shit happens and I’m sure it was fine. good grief.

I’d like to see the next potato famine movie cast with a Chinese lead actor. Maybe they could say the character took a wrong turn on the way to California.

Oh, I know. I just think it’s funny that people shit on Disney’s big eye designs then fawn over anime which has now become 90% eye.

As a divorce lawyer, my eye is twitching at the idea of Johnny fucking Depp not having a prenup.

It’s COMPLETELY, ETHICALLY WRONG to speculate what has happened.

Why is he allowed to show his nipples? Man has boobs and he's not trying to breastfeed anyone so I see zero reason why this is ok if it's not ok for me to let my natural God made breasts out.

I mean, is there a reason you had to get condescending? I did read your whole post, all two sentences of it.

As someone whose grandparents both suffered from dementia, I certainly don’t think it’s a laughing matter (but hey, different strokes for different folks), but I find it even worse that Ferrell would use a real historical figure for this, particularly one whose immediate family is still alive. It just seems incredibly…

Would you say committing a victimless crime is the same as committing an actual crime?

Tattoo prejudice? Really? What a fucking joke you are.

People get tattoos for all sorts of reasons. Lots are lame. Some are religious, cultural, a memorial for a loved one, etc. The oldest mummies that still have intact skin — all are tattooed! It’s one of the few universal human traditions across all eras and continents... but sure, all tattooed people should die…

She’s 2. If, at age 13, she wants a tattoo, then as long as it’s aesthetically pleasant and in a part of the body that won’t stretch the image and cause her to hate it forever as a result, game on. I’ll drive her myself.

Thank God that the parents of the decedents had nothing in the way of responsibility and/or accountability.

My daughter is 9 and she still plays with dolls. Though she tends to prefer the Furby who haunts my nightmares... Also, my 9 year old students definitely play with Barbies and Shopkins.