You are making no sense - you are saying that your former employer had the power to force you (and the other employees) to remain employed with them against your (and their) will. You don't need "permission" from your employer to quit your job, and your employer can't sue you to force you to stay employed with them.

That's because it causes delays, which are not an issue with private visits.

There already is a Rocky Horror sequel - called Shock Treatment..

"Though many government employees are working to tighten the laws around taking upskirt shots, others, like one judge in our fair nation's capital, are not." - Judges don't change laws.

No, the photos he took were not illegal, as found by the court.

Actually, the court also found that he committed no crime regardless of the actions of the police.

Why is it so hard for people (especially on this site) to understand that you have no reasonable expectation of privacy when you are in public (with limited exceptions, such as restrooms, locker rooms, etc.)..? If you expose a part of your body to the public (either intentionally or not), then you have no reasonable…

Actually, the case was dismissed more on the point that the woman was not nude. The new law actually would not make what this guy did illegal because of how specifically the statute is written.

You need to have an understanding of what "reasonable expectation of privacy" means, as that is what this case is about; if you expose a part of yourself in public (intentionally or accidentally), you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in regards to your body parts that are exposed.

What he did was not illegal.

GlanceAskance is wrong - this man did nothing illegal, and the court found as such.

There is also two entire pages devoted to explaining that the women he photographed had no reasonable expectation of privacy, so it very much is the holding of this case that they had no reasonable expectation of privacy, and that nothing he did was illegal.

"Now, the pictures that turned up certainly indicate that man was engaged in illegal voyeurism..." - No, they do not - as was pointed out by the court.

Yeah, it can be tough dealing with wanting to adopt all of the dogs. I also fostered a number of dogs, so had them in my home for extended periods as well. You do get accustomed to the situation, though - and the reality is that adopting a pet should not be done on impulse, and you realize pretty quickly that some of…

"PR definitely works hard to intentionally exhaust their designers to create drama and tension, and they definitely pick one person to edit into the most "hated" of each season." - At this point in time, it is widely known that this is what happens, that this is one of the main goals of these shows in an effort to…

Oh, no problem - I tend to speak / write in a rather direct tone, so I wasn't trying to be aggressive or anything..

Well, would that not be an issue in any situation involving meeting new people? The point being, there's a trade-off; if you want a way to vet people before committing to meet up with them in a date situation in the hopes of being safer, you need to get out and meet people in a more public or group-type situation so…

Oh, I'm sure that exists somewhere... :^)

No, I'm not making any leaps or assumptions.

So, you volunteered for a situation in which you were placed all alone with not one other person around? Or was it a situation in which you ...met people? Keep in mind, none of the people you meet (anywhere) are required to date you. So saying that a suggestion to join a volunteer group is terrible / lousy advice in…