So, you are arguing that just because a person isn't criminally charged with or convicted of homicide that it isn't homicide (i.e., the killing of one human being by another)? I am getting that information from the dictionary definition of the word "homicide" ("by definition - yes"). Just because it may have been an…

If the car was being driven by a person, by definition - yes (vehicular homicide or negligent homicide are the terms typically used, I believe).

That's what I was wondering. You seem to be very focused on facts and specifics, so I thought you might want to know that even accidents like you describe would be classified as homicides (just like an officer accidentally killing a civilian would be), since you seemed to think they are not. Also (again, facts and…

"In 2013 there were a total of 11 officers killed who were fatally injured when "struck by a vehicle." I sincerely doubt that all were homicides. I sincerely doubt that most were homicides. " - are you claiming that there were no drivers in these vehicles - that they were driving themselves..?

Why accuse you of starting an argument? Because you jumped into this conversation by way of starting an argument about "bro" vs. "bitch", perhaps...??? "Um you were being quite rude to NikkiDix ." - Where (and in what way) was I being any more rude to NikkiDix than she was to me first? "I did not write aggressively…

"You do not think comparing someone to a female dog is insulting?" - where did I say I did not? And I wasn't using the word as an insult (or to compare anyone to a female dog, as I hold a very high opinion of dogs), I was literally using the dictionary definition of the word to describe how the writer was acting.

You are wrong, and you know it. "Bro" is specifically used here on jezebel (and many places, by many people) as an insult (synonymous with "douchebag") - by the writers themselves as well, nonetheless - and employed to belittle. Do not even try to pretend this is not the case, because you know it is. And either way,…

"Hey, nothing like getting abusive on a feminist site to prove what a stellar human being you are." - tell that to Tracie Egan Morrissey.

"First off, chill bro. That much bold and italic text is making you look a little unhinged."

Listen, babe - you replied in response to my having posted a final statement stating that being born female doesn't give you a pass, etc. - therefore, it could only have been concluded from that reply that you do, indeed think that you get a pass for any and all shitty behavior and are absolved of any consequences of…

Then you're an idiot (which I had already figured out by now anyway, but thanks for admitting to as much).

...well, was he actively having sex with a child at the time...? Or talking about how he wanted to have sex with children because he is sexually attracted primarily or exclusively to children...? Because "pedophile" is a medically- and legally-defined term describing someone with a certain, specific type of…

Nope. What you call "feminist reality" is not reality, nor acceptable behavior; you can't insist people treat you with respect if you treat them like shit. Call me "Bro" and you will get the same respect (or lack thereof) from me in return. Calling yourself a "Feminist" doesn't give you special license to be…

First off, chill babe. Your false accusations and attempts at condescension are making you look like an asshole. And in regards to bold and italic text; well, it wasn't anywhere near what I see so many of the writers on this site doing - so I guess (again, based on your logic) the writers here are all waaaay unhinged,…

Considering that half the point (perhaps even the entire point) of this site is to engage the readers in discussions of the topics being presented (which is why the comments section exists at all) - yes, it did.

"Setting aside the obvious differences between rape gifs and penises..." - When did the OP ever compare these drawings to rape gifs...? Let me answer that for you; they didn't. You are putting words in their mouth in a failed attempt to discredit the point they are actually making.

The OP is not equating this to rape gifs. - they are equating it to naked drawings of Disney princesses (naked cartoon bodies).

..says the writer for a site with a comments section (replying within that comments section, nonetheless).

Totally agree...!

I agree whole-hardheartedly with all of this, but need to clarify one minor point; consent is not required when recording people in public (consent to be recorded is actually tacit when in public in the US, with varying degrees per state), and neither is posting the recording online in non-commercial context*. HOWEVER …