There are also many artists who complain about the fact that they don't make as much money as they would like from their music being licensed to services like spotify. Any recording artist who wants to give their music away for free has the option of remaining independent and doing all of the work (marketing,…

Artists (like Kaskade) who sign contracts that give their label full ownership in the copyright to their recordings receive the benefits of financial, marketing, publishing, and distribution support - among many other things. Recording labels are a business, and must protect their assets in order to 1) provide the…

Get back to me when you 1) grow up and 2) are able to provide links and quoted text to where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason."*

Get back to me when you 1) grow up and 2) are able to provide links and quoted text to where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason."*

Get back to me when you 1) grow up and 2) are able to provide links and quoted text to where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason."*

Get back to me when you 1) grow up and 2) are able to provide links and quoted text to where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason."*

At no point have I expressed an interest in what you believe or have to say at all, yet you keep replying.

Get back to me when you 1) grow up and 2) are able to provide links and quoted text to where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason."*

Ah, using a neurodevelopmental disorder as an insult - classy!

You're like a 9-year old who is so excited to discover their first swear word that they want to use it as much as possible - so cute...!

Get back to me when you 1) grow up and 2) are able to provide links and quoted text to where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason."*

No, everyone (including you) has been arguing against points that I never made. The writer of this piece admitted I was right on my first point (she was not "banned"), and nobody has proven that a behind-the-scenes dress code conspiracy is the reasoning behind these employees' actions.

So mature! So unable to back up your claims! So sad..!!!

You misquoted me - and now you are conflating that instance with a different paragraph regarding some possible reasons I listed (but do not necessarily believe). Again, let's stick with actual facts here, and not mix things up to suit whatever your argument is.

Really bolstering your credibility there, aren't you...?

Again:

Please point out specifically where I "defended their right to treat someone poorly without reason." Link and quoted text, please.

Do you not grasp the concept that calling yourself something is not the same as being publicly humiliated by strangers?

No, it is "nitpicky" stuff like this that is the difference between actual fact and misrepresentation or "spinning" a story to mislead readers. When it comes to reporting news stories - while purportedly presenting facts - being "nitpicky" is extremely important. It is misleading tactics such as this that make the…

....aaaaand still missing the entire point. Congrats again...!