Congratulations on missing the entire point.

"So pedantic this evening! Hush now, snarkypants." - this phrase was written specifically to ridicule. Let's at least be honest with our own intent before criticizing that of strangers you read about on the internet through the words of someone who is angry. What is clear is that you have an inflated sense of ego and…

I am talking about the second incident, at a different pool, with a different group of employees, in which she was not ridiculed - the incident in which she was actually not allowed to swim in the pool with that swimsuit. In that situation, there is no evidence that points to the supervisor wanting to "whore shame"…

What's also funny is that, in your first response to me, you criticize the employee at the first pool (even though I was talking specifically about the incident at the second pool) for ridiculing this woman - after jumping into the discussion simply to ridicule me. You might want to not do exactly what you are…

No, the source article says "again, she ran into problems" - that does not mean she was also treated with ridicule ("similar manner") at the second pool. And as I've already said, t is quite possible that they are either told or simply think "If it looks like underwear, it's not allowed" just to stay on the safe side…

Thanks for getting back. Out of curiosity, do you know why they used it in the URL...?

That's nice.

No, I said they were acting in accordance to rules that are based on Health Code. And yes - a Health Code does exist. It was simply wrongly applied here, as I have stated. I am not arguing that she was actually in violation of the code. Also, you seem to have missed (or are intentionally ignoring) this part of my…

"YOU are not allowed in this pool at all" and "You cannot swim in this pool in that specific outfit" are two different things. The first one is banning the person, the second is not.

No, my points are that 1) She was not "Banned" from either pool (though she was prohibited from swimming in the second with that particular swimsuit on) and 2) Employees were enforcing rules that are based on Health Codes, which is different than a dress code. The writer claimed that she was banned (which she was…

Yes, I know. I read the story, as well as the source article. Do you have a point..?

Nothing in the source article says she was banned.

I am basing my opinion of what her suit looked like on the actual photo of her in her actual suit, as posted in the source article:

..um, ok...?

Oh. my GOD you are an idiot. I was talking ONLY about the second situation. from the very beginning - THAT is what you initially responded to. Yes - I already acknowledged the employees were in the wrong. I never said they weren't. And yes, the employee at the first pool was an asshole for making fun of her. I never…

I am talking about the incident at the second pool, you idiot.

Let's be clear about something; From the beginning, I was discussing the second situation, in which she was actually not allowed in the pool with that swimsuit. You jumped in with your opinion (in regards to my comment about the second situation) - which you based on the person actions in the first situation. I…

Yes, there were two different situations, at two different pools, on two different days - as detailed in the source article. Very confusing.

Yes, the article describes how the employee at the first pool (the one who did allow her to swim) was rude to her. I never disputed that. However, that has nothing to do with the fact that there is a Health Code upon which these rules are based, and upon which the employees were acting in regards to her attire being…

Is there evidence of ongoing "whore shaming" of any woman who wears a two-piece bathing suit at either or both of these pools?