mynameagain
mynameagain
mynameagain

Don't you just love it when people who know absolutely nothing about photography, the process involved, and the technical aspects of it decide to criticize a photographer's technical skills and complain about retouching as if it never existed before Photoshop...?!? It is beyond absurd how ignorant the writers (as

The watermark is to indicate ownership of / credit for the graphic that was created from the photos, not of the source photos themselves.

Only if jezebel purchased the copyright(s) outright (which I doubt is the case, because that is incredibly expensive, even with much lesser-known photographers - and also the fact that the images were shot for a publication) - otherwise, the photographer still owns the images.

These are glamour photos. Perfection / idealism is - and always has been - the entire point of glamour photos. They serve to present an image of a persona, not to document the reality of the person. This kind of thing has been going on long before digital photography (and Terry Richardson) even existed. This is

This artist is a man, not a woman - and these are clearly self-promotional, given 1) the artist's logo being prominently featured on each one and 2) the fact that they are not being used by any anti-DV / victim advocacy groups (most likely because they capitalize on images of violence and victimization rather than

What an asshole. Apparently she was also arrested for DUI while pregnant with that baby.