What do you think I think it says, Sir…please tell me what I think.

That's right: put us into a category so it's easier to hate.

How about this one, Shadow? Is this one not "valid" enough? Probably not, but I'll give it a try:

4. Uncoupling of ATP-mediated Calcium Signaling and Dysregulated IL-6 Secretion in Dendritic Cells by Nanomolar Thimerosal

*Pours butter on popcorn*

1. Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism

Sorry Steve. Those weren't my intentions. Just your assumptions.

*yawn* anything else you'd like to vent about?

I didn't insult anyone. That's your opinion, Sir. And now we're off topic again.

I never said you should "listen to me."

"The other studies have to do with other more minor side-effects."

How can I get funded by the FDA or any other 3-letter, tax accepting agency, for this study?

Are you talking about the Mercola study?

Ad hominem that addresses nothing.

You've already made up your mind from the tone of your post. What's the point in giving them to you if you're obviously just gonna come back with, "bullshit" type insults?

That's it, Jeremy? Anything to add?

So does a vaccinated child that sheds their skin.

To be fair, Sir, you didn't even read all of them. Why comment if you have a fraction of what I"m giving you?

Study #19, "19. A study conducted by The George Washington University School of Public Health "

Then i'm sorry, inamine. You didn't read everything I gave you. Do you want me to find where it says that and post it here for you?