The number of people who have opinions on a project that they “are not fully informed about” is staggering...

Maybe people should actually take the time to read the MOU before “explaining” things to people and explaining it incorrectly.

Please outline the “vitriolic” comments. Sure seems like disagreeing with a poor decision is being treated as some sort personal attack.

The CC wouldn’t defend their decision...being questions for their decision is what democracy is all about.