@koolykool44: I've seen two stock ones in my life - the rest have been molested. Especially those.
@koolykool44: I've seen two stock ones in my life - the rest have been molested. Especially those.
@FightingChance: Motherfuck, motherfuck, noise noise noise.
@maximum_sarge: Hahahaha, yes! That's my best idea as well.
@kake81: Hah! My thoughts ran along similar paths, incidentally.
@Shadowman615: He doesn't care. He's over that now.
@rev_junkie: They are the most frequently attacked. "Save the Supras" would be equally relevant for different reasons, though.
@spyderr0de0: And the Citroën chevrons, and the driveshaft-through-skull, and...
@duurtlang: Definitely the right car.
@theart: Not a bad analogy. The Firebirds seemed to be louvred slightly less often, which couldn't really be a bad thing, and I preferred their styling tweaks.
@Fedaykin528: I can beat that: brand-new Camry.
@Socialvegetable: I'm not totally opposed to flames. I am totally opposed to rear-window flags in anything that isn't a white '88-97 Chevy/GMC.
@76Eldo: The Amazing $550 Accord I bought for my friend (he was in jail at the time but needed a car as soon as he got out) had an 'in loving memory' sticker from the local 4H club, as well as a sticker from a nonexistent 'custom' shop in the town where I bought the car (one town over from the PCH '68 Cadillac…
@theart: This. Also, they look brilliant on the right car - it's just that a third-gen F-body isn't really the right car.
@76Eldo: ...says 76Eldo.
@spyderr0de0: Say it ain't so!
@ChiefPontiaxe is now also Chief VolvoWagonAxe: These don't bother me on a white car, but they do bother me when the car's a different colour.
@jbh11126: Probably both, but hopefully the former, at least.
@B52: What a brilliant ad, given that the '59 cars were toned way down, and the 1960 models looked like conservative Pontiacs...