Nope, no way you are correct, based on what everyone here says ;)

Seriously - he is very good at what he does, and I know he made those tools as well, but it is more like “make your own stone ax, knife and a hammer, and then make a bow with those tools instead of the stuff you bought at Ace”.

Such a weird reason to get upset. 4Runner offers huge wheels on the limited, but they have very off road worthy wheels and tires on the Trail, and some regular sized wheels on the SR5. If this ever gets produced, it will be the same.

Get woke? Wtf does that even mean?

And what do you think you are doing? Spewing some unheard before wisdom?

Actually, I voted Obama twice in a row, but nice try.

OK, whatever, it is a business, one way or the other. A multi billion dollar business, which does research into how to make money. If there was money in Female POV VR sex, even in regular female POV sex, don’t you think they’d be all over it?

Finally a fucking answer that makes sense! Thank you, that makes a lot of sense. The only issue I see is this - would you see yourself on the dude (I presume you are on top in this scenario) , like (parts of) your own breast and legs and arms, or would this just be dudes face and a torso you see?

I have an idea what women get out of porn - I’ve watched porn with a girl before, just to do something different, we’d get frisky and we would do it. What I don’t understand is why am I being treated as a pariah because I had the gall to wonder why we need Female POV VR sex, and what would a female get out of it…

You are such an angry person, and you need some treatment. That is what you super sensitive dudes do, correct, because words hurt and you need your little safe zones?

Well, what I mean is this. Currently, most porn is 3rd person view - cameras on the side, and recording the whole action, or doing close ups of the action, right. Occasionally, there are videos, and they seem to have their own category of POV, where the camera is basically centered right where the dudes head is, so…

So, you are straight and you want porn that does not focus on vaginas and boobs, no lesbian sex, and no gay sex. I’ve seen sort artsy sex - nothing demeaning, very slow and gentle, 3rd person view. Is that what you want? If so, it does exist. You can see dudes and ladies at the same part, not too much close ups of any…

So, I have no life, can’t get an erection and I am an asshole, because I have an opinion? Maybe I should call you an angry liberal beaver muncher, if we are doing some weird offensive stereotypes?

No, it didn’t always had those. It actually used to be a cool blog, posts and comments were very tech oriented, but things changed - rapidly - when the whole “linked/trending articles” thing took off and Jezebel and Gawker commentators started commenting here as well.

What do you think you’d see from a female perspective in a VR porn video? I am genuinely interested. Which sex position would do it for you, and how would 3rd party view not be better for you?

Try again - there is plenty of sex on any of these sites that still offer plenty of 3rd party videos where you can see guys.

I am a dummy because I have an opinion?

No. I meant “ I am irriated that Gawker is fighting the fight for women equality by asking for fucking female POV sex VR channel when there is no demand for it, because it there was, a multi billion dollar porn industry would do it already”.

Gays and horny straight girls, from what I gathered here.

And here I am thinking we’ve been fighting for equal wages, voting rights and other important things...