The underlying argument is that equal opportunity should not necessarily equate to exactly equal distribution in societal/professional roles and exactly equivalent pay between sexes (at the aggregate). 100% accurate.

Seems like someone took time to manufacture a big story out of nothing here. Not surprising.

At first I thought “what a waste of time, all of this reading and no payoff.” Then I look at the title again and realize that’s really all there is to it. Nobody knows where to find the aircraft carrier. Got it.

It doesn’t really matter. All captured and purposefully bred animal species were once wild.

Technically you’re both right. Supply, meet demand. Takes two to make a market.

My first thought was “no way was this in America” and sure enough, it wasn't.

“Four months and nearly 100,000 metric tons of methane later, climate change is probably maybe kinda worse”

The model could make sense for the environment in certain scenarios. Some people may not drive by a gas station as part of their daily commutes. Find a parking lot full of those folks and you’ve actually created efficiencies. From an economic standpoint, you could make the argument that the most productive people…