mullymt1
Montana Matt
mullymt1

I’m 36. I’m saying that it’s sad that you are in your mid 40’s and still have the sort of temper tantrum that one might expect from a teenager. I also think it’s funny that you think you’ve succeeded in life, when your writing ability and anger levels make it pretty clear that you have not.

Mid-40s? Man, that’s really sad.

Sign me up! Wait, if I join, do I have to eat Subway for three meals a day?

Are they good cooks? And is the food free? Because if so, I’ll play.

I know that being a teenager is rough. I’m sorry about that. I’d tell you that it gets better, but I’m not sure that’s actually true in your case.

I recognize the risks to my kids are marginal”

You’re mad at him, and not the company that didn’t pay?!

Did you read the part of the sentence that comes after your quote? Because the rest of this is bullshit.

Let me get this straight-You’re poor so you know science? That doesn’t make any sense.

I’m not sure what being married to a black woman has to do with ignoring science.

So you don’t like science then? It’s not that there is a minimal chance, it’s that there is no chance. At all. You are risking nothing by eating the sandwich, and invoking hypothetical children doesn’t change that.

Nope.

This includes political comments.

That understanding is incorrect. Remember, even Vattel admits that England had birthright citizenship. The Articles and the Constitution are based on a continuity of legal traditions, even if the sovereign had changed. Our adherence to common law is the most obvious example. So, barring an affirmative split by either

By “reexamine the laws/practices” do you mean a Constitutional Amendment? Because that’s what would really be necessary, notwithstanding the candidates’ declarations that they would try to change it unilaterally.

It’s not, though. First, our legal tradition is English, not French. There is a reason American law students learn Blackstone for current law, while Vattel is discussed in a foreign, historical context. Second the discussion of citizenship at the time followed Blackstone’s conclusions. Remember, this clause was very

Given that it’s the blue states that fund the red, I think we’d be OK.

They are talking about deporting American citizens. That doesn’t sound crazy to you?

Wow. That is some messed up legal analysis. Did you go to the Trump University School of Law?

There is already a limit in place. It’s called the 14th Amendment.