Well, no disagreement there.

They do not, because they are not people. They are pictures. The purpose of child pornography laws is to protect the actual, living minors who are being photographed. If you dress up an 18-year-old like a 12-year-old and take pictures, it’s disgusting, but it’s likely not a crime because the person in the photo was…

“You can literally get arrested in some places for drawing a picture of someone who “looks” underage in pornographic material.”

I’m 36. I’m saying that it’s sad that you are in your mid 40’s and still have the sort of temper tantrum that one might expect from a teenager. I also think it’s funny that you think you’ve succeeded in life, when your writing ability and anger levels make it pretty clear that you have not.

So you’re willing to greatly increase the odds that some child will be victimized by this person in order to marginally reduce the odds that your child will be victimized. Nice.

Mid-40s? Man, that’s really sad.

Sign me up! Wait, if I join, do I have to eat Subway for three meals a day?

Are they good cooks? And is the food free? Because if so, I’ll play.

I know that being a teenager is rough. I’m sorry about that. I’d tell you that it gets better, but I’m not sure that’s actually true in your case.

Every food you have ever eaten has had its DNA manipulated by humans, with the exception of wild-caught fish. Why is this new method (which modifies far fewer genes than selective breeding) is the only method that needs to pass your made-up standard? And no, I don’t believe that you are pro-science, because you’ve…

“So again, please provide proof that we’ve accounted for every possible issue in modifying the DNA of a plant.”

This is great news. I grew up hunting sage grouse on the Idaho border (or rather, watching my father and grandfather hunt, as I was too young for a license), and the entire ecosystem is really something special. It would a terrible waste to destroy conservation efforts through such an intentionally hamfisted move as…

• Bt corn is expected to pose little environmental impact due to the highly selective nature of the expressed proteins. Numerous laboratory tests have indicated no acute adverse effects on many nontarget organisms and results of 47 field studies have shown no unexpected ecological risks to above-ground insect…

“I recognize the risks to my kids are marginal”

Ok, so science isn’t your strong suit. That’s cool. Maybe you can learn to sing or something?

You’re mad at him, and not the company that didn’t pay?!

Did you read the part of the sentence that comes after your quote? Because the rest of this is bullshit.

Let me get this straight-You’re poor so you know science? That doesn’t make any sense.

I’m not sure what being married to a black woman has to do with ignoring science.

So you don’t like science then? It’s not that there is a minimal chance, it’s that there is no chance. At all. You are risking nothing by eating the sandwich, and invoking hypothetical children doesn’t change that.