That literally makes no sense.

I meant vacations have gotten more profligate, not that they didn't exist.

Reading the comments, I think that the main issue here is relative income, not absolute income. A family in the 1950's would think that our basic expectations are extremely profligate. Aside from the technological advances that have improved our lives, that was a period where parents didn't expect their kids to go to…

Eating out and vacations were never a big part of being middle class. Remember your parents loading you in the car for a road trip for vacation? Why do you think that was?

Since this is a band surrounding to the median, I assume some went up and some went down...

Do you actually live in Michigan?

How many times have you eaten out this month? I'm including lunch. How many times have you gone out with friends? What type of clothes do you own?

Exactly.

We live far better than we did in the 50's. We live longer, we have better healthcare, we have meat at every meal if we want it, technology has provided use with luxuries that we would have never dreamed of...I think that the illusion is what you think the 50's looked like.

What do you think it should be? The entire bottom half of the country?

Yeah, none of those are are lies or misquotes, and I've covered the actual science about developing humans here, even if you are ignoring that fact. But honestly, that wasn't the point of my last message. Honestly I just think it's fun to play on your clear insecurities about your lack of a degree, and I think it's…

You're unhinged. Why is actual science too hard for you? Is it because of your anger?

Listen, I'm sorry that you didn't get through college, but these are all basic concepts you would have learned had you stayed. This isn't something you can figure out through anger.

"ZERO TESTING BEING PERFORMED ON DEVELOPING HUMAN ORGANISMS." You repeat this as if it it's relevant. This is true for all science, for obvious reasons. Instead, they do epidemiological studies, which have shown no dangerous effects here.

On Tinder?

You provided a dictionary definition of something you have not exhibited. Now you've switched to "scientists are getting paid to fake science." Even less logic. That's why there is the peer-review process, and that's why these studies are as transparent as possible. All the data is verifiable and reproducible; in…

Didn't one try to do this last week?

You're an idiot.

You just sent a bunch of the naturalnews cultish websites. And no, you aren't using logic. ALL of those sites are anti-vax sites as well. All of them (except wiki and the dictionary, obviously). None of these are peer-reviewed journals. In fact, I'm guessing you got your "adult male" nonsense from these websites…

None of that is actual logic. If you were genuinely interested, then you should look at the massive body of peer-reviewed research that shows that most approved GMOs are harmless. Repeating naturalnews nonsense isn't the same thing as research.