“Let me think it over will ya, Charlie? I got another guy on the line about some white walls.”

Or maybe this guy?

I’m sorry, Ryan, but in the 1951 classic “Rabbit Fire,” Elmer explicitly says that he’s a vegetarian who only hunts for sport.

The reason they haven’t put Avengers Tower in a Netflix series is because spending part of their effects budget on something not relevant to the story is a waste of money. I don’t know why anyone would ask such an obvious question, or why Love wouldn’t give the obvious answer.

Honestly, who cares? As long as the stories and characters are good, I couldn’t care less whether Avengers tower shows up on Netflix or ABC or whatever.

Not just a Trekkie though - he helped pay for the Cosmos reboot a few years back too.

Wait, I think I got it, guys. He’s calling wresting fake.

idk probably for the same reason they call car chases in movies “car chases” instead of “scripted car movements designed to look like a chase”????

Because they are having matches in the context of the fictional television storyline. QED.

Because not everyone is such a twat.

I worked in the family diner for years, and have heard two of these. Granted, it was a Midwest diner, not your classic east-coast spot, but still.

Have you tried the Mark Eden Bust Developer?:

Without that scene, an entire generation of thinkpieces were strangled in the digital womb

Which is exactly why he’s Number 1, in truth.

Peter can never win, so it’s really par for the course

Not every. Just the ones that did. Your hyperbole makes you less likely to be taken seriously.

I thoroughly disagree. Rhodes isn’t killed off because of his blackness, and Bendis—creator of Miles Morales; father of two black daughters—doesn’t strike me as the sort to carelessly tread on racial tropes.

Rhodey is killed off because he is extremely important to the two main characters of this piece, and serves to…

Whitesplaining or Mansplaining happen when people aren’t aware of their privilege in discounting the perspective of others. His mentioning it here indicates he’s aware of his privilege, and trying to explain his decision on the basis of the story without discounting other perspectives.

So you’re basically saying that he’s a human being with problems and not a mythological deity of some sort? Huh...