IGN UK isn't getting any of the non-gaming features. And Microsoft spent most of its videogame showcasing time rambling about a dog.

I'm sure if they took out the shitty DVR, it wouldn't cost any more to make it backwards compatible.

1) Once per month, with a mandatory patch at the end of the generation that makes being online irrelevant. Also, the features disabled if I don't go online shouldn't interfere with the function of any game.

Look, you do not have to take my word for it: game sales slumped because publishers got lazy and risk averse. They made some very bad decisions about making the same game over and over again. Fewer titles were released for the last generation, they were less risky so we got of excellent, but short games that looked…

I will believe it when I see it.

Business model, publishing, and distribution effect what GAMES they have. I am not buying a paper weight with a nice processor.

I'm not impressed by my Xbox. It did not have enough games (sports, sports, sports, shooter, identical shooter, sports), and its attempts to be an all around entertainment system were pretty much the clumsiest part of the system. By "not enough," I mean I own five games. Can't give a shit about Madden, and I rent…

Disagree. The XBOX has pretty much bungled the presentation of the machine at the very least. You can't get two execs to say the same thing, or the same exec to say the same thing in the course of an hour. You can't get straight answers in the first place. If they are that off message, it reeks of a major…

So... how much does Microsoft pay you?

There are plenty of people out there who have experienced being in love, but not attracted to their partner. If your partner is not attracted to YOU, there will never be a pill for that. Ever.

To be blunt, not being attracted to a particular person in the prime of one's life is not a disease. It is a relationship issue. There isn't ever going to be a pill for that.

That blows.

I'm completely the opposite. I've always heard ED is not related to aging, but to illnesses that are more common with age. There is a legitimate interest in restoring function (of any kind) lost to illness.

Impotence at any age is not part of the normal aging process. There is no reason a healthy man should not be able to have an erection. It is appropriate to treat.

Have they considered not charging $700 for a machine that requires developers to sink several years and millions of dollars into just to make one game? There used to be too many awesome games to possibly buy. Now I am lucky for a dozen worth having during a machine's life cycle.

I'm not sure that's everyone's personal flaw, though. Speaking for myself, and only myself, I've always been comfortable in very long term relationships. I'm sure some people are more prone to boredom, but generalizing your problems with monogamy into problems with monogamy— I don't buy it.

OK, but he's one guy. I'd avoid it with people you don't know well.

This is sort of true, but the proportions tend to change a bit and some shapes are pretty much just for skinny girls. Speaking for myself, I tended to want a little higher waist and a little longer sleeve (and not a goddamn bat wing sleeve, I mean a not too tight, halfway to the elbow sleeve) when I was very…

Wow. Very pretty. Refreshing to see a piece of clothing that isn't a scaled up version of skinny girl proportions, or that leopard print muu muu thing all designers do when they need to do something and say "Fuck it."

I think you talk about what you like and let them talk about what they like rather than trying to define a person by the sex acts they prefer, if you are talking about or to a specific person.