That's even worse! You serve THEM for a living. Wherever they are on the class food chain, you are lower right now. You don't have to make it into a contest over who is of a better class, and I'd strongly advise against it because you are losing pretty badly to them.

I think you might have to live in a world with a variety of people and communication styles in it rather than expect people to conform to you.

It's mostly a way for people to feel bougie and superior without actually having any class or discernible talents. You don't have to hone a vocabulary in order to claim you have a better one than someone who says "fuck." You just need to find someone who says "fuck" to look down your nose at.

As long as you're superior to something.

It depends on whether he or she was a sexist, I imagine. Sensibilities get a lot more delicate if you don't want to listen.

Wow.

Really? Do you read much, or study any history?

You have a problem with "low class" people? Is your classism their problem?

Well, that's petty and arbitrary. We've had some seriously great historical figures who swore. We have some seriously great people out there now who swear. This kind of smacks of an arbitrary and ultimately irrelevant thing some people have decided makes them superior, without having to put in the time or effort of…

I think that's a mistake. The biggest literary and minds of the 19th and 20th century basically all swore like sailors. We got super puritanical in the 50s, and now everyone born after then has been told that they sound stupid if they swear. It's a wive's tale.

You do know that you use a relatively small pool of words for most of your communication, right? It's not a reflection of the quality of your vocabulary.

Pfft, it is not. There is some wonderfully creative colorful language out there. Abraham goddamn Lincoln and Mark Twain told Aristocrats style jokes. Joyce wrote elaborate letters to his wife about fucking the farts out of her. Some of the best minds in history have devoted their genius to coming up with new ways…

Eh, the Millennial/ other generations divide is probably going to be a real thing because of the economic factors. Age is beginning to heavily correlate with poverty, and you are beginning to see people with power accusing a newly emerging set of people who are now poor (and if trends hold, will probably be poor for…

Yep. We don't need civil discourse everywhere. If you are making a good argument, you are still right even if you use colorful language. If you just want to say someone's a shithead, there's a place for that. Sometimes it's deeply satisfying to know someone is an unreachable abyss and hurl dicks down it.

I mean, I can, but it's more fun not to. Neither of you are really worth the effort of a serious debate.

Nope, you really are kind of unusually creepy. Doesn't make me frigid. Sorry, creeper!

It's strictly female objectification because that's the way the power dynamic goes. And if it did go the other way, no I don't think dehumanizing men is an awesome way to tip the balances any more than I think women on men spousal abuse or rape is a feminist coup.

The second she decides to sue, she can take it down.

No, no. About a third of women are raped, a lot more have close calls, and all of them have to spend parts of their year avoiding it. So men probably need to give a shit whether the women present are comfortable with them putting up spank material, or talking dirty, or whatever. Unless they're shitheads.

I'm sorry, I don't buy that it's my job to be a model minority so stupid bigots don't think badly of me. That argument plays great to the Stormfront crowd, though. You should try it there.