I didn't say that it was right because it's the law. I have not really made an argument for why it is right. I have made an argument that, whether either of us like it or not, he has to follow the law. I don't plan on arguing why it is or is not right. I don't usually argue to other kinds of criminals or criminal…

What? He's not relevant. If someone wants to sue him if he chooses to put up inappropriate posters at work, his feelings do not matter. If he thinks the woman is overreacting, it does not matter— and, in fact, "you're overreacting!" is the battle cry of an asshole being called on his shit and losing the argument. …

Nope, my argument does nothing to hurt or help any other woman. We're not a fucking hive vagina. Besides,it's not like we haven't heard misogynists telling us they're being shitty because one of us failed to be a model minority before. Same shit, different shithead.

And yet my opinion is one you legally must conform to, and your opinion is the whining of a nobody about having to conform to the barest of social standards. Even if I am a terrible person who talks like a middle schooler, I win in every fucking way that matters. YOU still have to live by MY standards. And thank…

I didn't say said anything worse about your character than you demonstrated.

Because some gay people need their own minority to shit on.

It doesn't matter. Don't hang your spank material in the office if you don't want to get sued. Your feelings on this issue, or whether she works on sexually explicit material as part of her work load, do not matter. This has been case law for 30+ years. This should not be news to you.

You know, a lot of it has to do with the fact that, when we're at work, it's nice to function as a worker and not as a woman. And where women are depicted, it's nice to see them as respected people instead of passive semen repositories.

Actually, if she does not like it, she can sue, win handily, then find a different job.

It's a good thing we have men to tell us what the difference is, am I right?

This discussion is making me wonder the following things:

Thank you so much for using the simple fucking english dictionary and ignoring decades of discourse on feminism and misogyny. If I need someone to comically miss the fucking point, I will remember you for future gigs.

Like the female body on your own goddamn time. You can keep it in your pants like a big boy for 8 fucking hours. I am perfectly sex positive. I love sex. But men (and not children) understand there's a time and a place for it. It's not the office. Women might be legitimately uncomfortable with being portrayed as…

Do you jerk it to boobs?

No, he does not. He may have Aspberger's, but not a point.

Uh, I can't walk down the street topless without one of those guys who "does not get why it's a big deal" being incredibly shitty about it. Right now, breasts are treated like sexual organs. You may not "get it," but it does not matter if YOU get it. More socially aware people do.

It's not a great choice for English Lit classes. It's not at all relevant to the life of a 15 year old.

I seriously think they should re-think the reading list, and it should have the following criteria:

I personally have a very low rent, but we don't really live in a low cost of living city. It's a tradeoff, though, where there is work and income, the rents are higher. Most of my friends either live 3-5 people to an apartment or with their parents, or in very very small apartments. My husband and I live in a 250…

Yep, that was my same exact first salary in 2010.

It's orders of magnitude worse now. I'd kill for 1992 wages and employment rates. I'd do a lot more for 1996 ones.