I an interested to see what their end game is for this. Are they just trying to get hits? Are they trying to call attention to something? Are they going to try to continue this ruse, or try to defend its legitimacy?

I would agree, this video just does not pass the eyeball test. The textures and lighting just look wrong, even with the blurry video. The first time I watched it was in the smaller window and it was passable, but expanding and watching it again, it's pretty obvious.

Aside the fact that it looks fake, you are right about the way she is holding it. There is no compensation at all on her part for the momentum of the "wings" moving up and down. Even if they are remarkably light, the movement would have certainly created some motion that her arms would have to account for. Instead it…

"A product has to be genuinely better."

I have this one first, just edging out The Animated Series version. Its a pretty close call though.

I don't mean to get into any sort of an argument with anyone, so I will just say this:

Even though the term OCD is WAY over used and seemingly misunderstood (or at least understood to a very basic level), I can sympathize with what is being expressed here. Any time I hear that a game has a lot of "choices", paths you can take, or multiple endings you can see depending on how you play the game, that is…

Except, of course, for nearly every sense of the word.

Yes, when I saw that one I had to go recheck the article to make sure this was not some kind of Motocross Madness HD port or something.

Thank you?

"There are a lot of assholes in the ocean..."

Pretty sure this is one of those that people fake, there is little chance that puppies for confused for pussy. The s and the p are so far away from eachother.

My favorite was:

I think that someone needs to address the bigger issue here, that being Gizmodo's insensitive use of the term "Food Addict." I have personally been addicted to food for over 23 years, and no matter what I try, there seems to be no cure for my condition.

Great, now how about an auto-capitalization feature for gmail. I know the is an extension that does this, but in my experience, its performance was less than optimal. Something native to gmail would be appreciated.

This was just an explanation of how to covertly develop a key, which would then be used in some fashion to encode information.

That would create a whole different problem, one beyond the scope of encryption.

Didn't want to go spouting off niceties without double checking my math.

Hold on, let me check...

There is a difference between what you and @yodelling yokel are talking about. You are talking about giving cameras a "base ISO" rating based on the sensor they use, which I agree not be accurate, but what @yodelling yokel is saying giving the camera's their rating based on all of the factors that you described, which…