mscduk
mscduk
mscduk

You’re missing the point. The baby isn’t entitled to a title. The Queen almost certainly offered one, as she did for Anne, Andrew and Edward’s kids, but Harry and Meghan had the right to refuse, as Anne did.

To u it’s a shitty choice

Except when William is King, Harry will be the equivalent of Princess Margaret and his & Meghan’s kids will be the equivalent of David and Sarah Armstrong-Jones, ie they’ll turn up at weddings and funerals and only the oldies will know who they are. And when George is King, Harry and Meghan’s kids will be the

Yes, but she is Princess William, not Princess Catherine and that is a distinction most people do not understand.

In the US. Archie is a very English name.

To those in the know the greatest example of Archie is clear. Archie Leach (not so bad after all maybe)-

I've been reading (my ancient phone won't let me link) that Diana herself refused RPOs after the divorce, not that it was taken away from her. When the boys were with her, their protection officer naturally accompanied them.

The reports that Charles plans to “streamline” the core unit are half true, really, because it doesn’t require any concerted effort on his part. Royals have been “streamlining” forever. The Queen has cousins, for instance, who were once as proximate to the center of the action as Archie is now. Michael of Kent was

OK Kelly, I am no expert, but as I said on another thread, I think it’d be a little off/insensitive to upgrade the Earl of Dumbarton to “lord” because it’s a Scottish earldom, and they don’t do that courtesy title. Heirs to Scottish earldoms go by “Master,” which is what they said the baby would go by.

A voice of Winnie the Pooh. Not the voice. If anyone gets the honor of the definite article, it’s Sterling Holloway.

“I forgot I was torturing the dog...” is NOT a great defense strategy

Is it a terrible surprise that one of the biggest voice actors in American animation (he’s in like every single Disney movie) is a fucking scum bag? Seems like a model employee for the industry. His responses to the allegations are just straight-up admissions of guilt, too, basically stating that he did it but it

As a former bandgeek, absolutely!

Maybe marching bands are just awesome, and we can just celebrate mainstream celebs utilizing them in such high-profile ways.

Madonna did the marching band motif back in 2012 during her Super Bowl Halftime show. I doubt Beyoncé even thought about that when planning her (genius) Homecoming set/motif. And I seriously doubt Swift was trying to one-up Lady Bey with this performance. People need to stop pitting female performers against each

I would compare this more to whether women have long or short hair, not whether they shave their pits or not. And plenty of spouses and SOs have preferences on their ladyfriends’ hairstyles. Is it an oppressive, controlling mandate? No, it’s an aesthetic opinion. A friend of mine cut her hair short on a whim, and her

Lots of women like chest hair. However, and I’m certainly not speaking for all here, I’m wondering if it might be an age thing. When I was younger I thought it unappealing, but now I definitely prefer men to have hair.

Okay, so having read the actual scientific article that was linked in the above news report, there are multiple issues with this report.
First, it’s published in a Radiology journal, not a microbiology or infectious disease journal. It’s underpowered (too few participants). They give no methodology for how they are

I mean, he was so hideous as a young 20-something on Baywatch without a beard and with short hair.

I’m pro chest hair. I always thought shaved chests were weird, unless you’re a swimmer or something.