Court documents are available online. Have you really not seen any? The staff of their complex.. 6 of them swore in the days after the “abuse” she had no marks on her face. They amazingly appear the day of her public filing. Neighbors have sworn the same. That should he enough but now multiple women have come forward…

Her evidence was sold to tabloids so those were seen and arent believable. His evidence was detailed, in part, in his lawsuit. Maybe not every single shred will make it into court though dont you think itd be foolish if there wasnt some legitimacy to those cctv tapes since the burden of proof is on him? My point of…

Not the same situation at all. To put the difference in perspective, that’s like telling on someone who’s making threats with a gun versus being at an active shooting where there’s evidence, a smoking gun if you will. Whose side do you think the police are more inclined to be biased too when they arrive, the shooter…

Court documents. At the very least you can find excerpts from her friend's statement (raquel something) for Ambers TRO online. May take some digging to get the full document at this point.

Allow me to translate.

This exactly, I think theyre equally crazy. Idr where it was reported but there was the cop that showed up after one of their fights and found no injuries or evidence of anything Heard claimed Johnny did, and the cop was Female, who would definitely be biased to take Heard’s side from the beginning

Sorry but I go where the evidence leads and Ambers evidence has been questionable from the start. If a witness states a victims face is half swollen and photos show zero sign of swelling, then why am I obligated to accept the story as truth? It seems Jez writers and readers need a story to be cartoonishly ridiculous…

I know, I know, there will be consequences for challenging the echo chamber, but I’m willing to take that bullet.

Wait, didn’t it recently come out that she was a completely abusive psycho towards him, even going as far as to injure him? I didn’t see that being reported around here....

Do they though ? I’ve never read quite so many nasty stories about Meghan as I have on Celebitchy - they float so many stories, with that faux concern about how everyone hates Meghan, and why does the media print so many stories, and all I can think is “Why do you publish so many stories, about every single rumour?”.…

Buy an island and fill it with rescue dogs.

This whole tabloid, genuinely trumped up woman-against-woman popularity struggle story is misogynistic (and almost certainly racist as well, although I’m 15+ years out of England). If media would only stop giving it air, it would die. 

She’s wearing a ring that belonged to Diana in that after party wedding picture, isn’t she?

She’s the new Fergie--someone new to disparage who can take prying eyes away from the older brother’s wife.

Right. This is a super nothing story; seems to be floating around just to make Meghan look bad. 

It doesn’t make any sense to me. She hasn’t really been to any event that would warrant that kind of jewelry, like a state dinner or something.

Diana had a few pieces, but they were on loan from the Queen, and reverted back to her at the end of the loan. She also had jewelry of her own that she kept in the divorce, and was given to her sons after her death. Kate has been seen wearing a few jewelry pieces Diana wore (like the Lover’s Knot Tiara), but they were…

The Sun is a racist rag (owned, IIRC, by Rupert Murdoch) so this is just another piece of trash.  Good on her PR team from correcting the record.  Everything Megan goes through reminds me of what Princess Di endured.

Diana’s personal jewelry was divided between her sons after her death. Meghan has been pictured several times wearing pieces that Harry received.

This Us story says the opposite: https://www.usmagazine.com/stylish/news/queen-elizabeth-ok-with-meghan-markle-wearing-royal-jewelry-details/