What’s there to argue about? A couple horses died almost 100 years ago, exactly in the fashion the article says they died.
MrTastyCakes
mrtastycakes
He took what are basically toy lines and turned them into, frankly, the best you are going to get.
he (she?) can actually take credit for pieces or denounce fakes...the thing is, how do you know the person taking credit is genuine either?
Figure half an hour to an hour tops on site to complete that piece.
I think the significance of the burning tire is perhaps a critique of our post-industrial society, perhaps related to England’s searching for it’s new place in a post-Imperial world that had defined the country for hundreds of years.
It was and is properly referred to as butt-rock.
That google translate thing is some future shit.
The kid isn’t pushing a burning tire.
The ignorance is rage inducing.
No, it doesn’t sound anything like something Gawker would publish
Been there, done that.
I’m not going to say he’s wrong until they actually do some on the ground research
Kid, put together a kickstarter and mount an expedition.
So, instead of just saying hey good job kid, it’s a possibilty and being open minded and encouraging, instead they are immediately denying it and telling the kid to shut up.
They too need to say “that can’t yet be verified” not “you are wrong”, because they don’t know he is wrong.
Lol, what scientist of all of his years is going to like being upstaged by a kid at school.
I don’t have the exact GPS coordinates, but IIRC the site is only about 10 miles from a village which can be reached by road vehicles.
Well, then maybe you can put up the $100k the kid says he needs to go check it out. You can ignore the fact that a dozen people could travel all the way down and back on $20k or less, and still have some cash left over to party on the way.
You can’t just say “I think you are wrong even though you have evidence”