It’s dismembered inside the uterus in order to easily remove it.

I think the article state the bill has an exception for those cases. Correct me if I’m wrong. Seriously. Not being smug but I usually glance over details.

Most children will be born naturally to two parents. One of which will be a man. To say men never think of abortion is simple ignorance.

Inalienable right to life.

So you don’t have a problem with the dismemberment? How else are you supposed to get a 2nd trimester baby out?

No one forced you to get pregnant. That’s called rape. We have laws against that. We also have all manner of contraception. I’m all for 1st trimester abortion but at some point these women are going to have to take some responsibility. “Why can’t I abort my baby at 38 weeks!?” Take some responsibility and abort it…

No one is punishing you for having safe protected sex where contraceptives are used. We’re just trying to keep people from slidding into aborting 38 week babies because, “lol xd that means you don’t want women to have fun”. You know it’s a logical fallacy.

Didn’t the article say the bill has an exception for such cases? I don’t think people should be able to just decide whimsically they can abort a developing child at any stage simply because they don’t want it. They should decide that earlier on. I know it’s a difficult choice but at some point, I feel, it’s a much…

That’s quite a convenient simplification. Consent to sex is consent to pregnancy if proper contraceptive care isn’t taken because one naturally flows from the other. It’s like saying I didn’t consent to go flying through the window of my car because consent to flying out the window of my car is separate from consent…

Why are people defending 2nd Trimester abortion. Do people know the difference between 1st Trimester and 2nd Trimester abortion?