No I appreciate people who resist censorship from all races, it’s you who brought race into this racialist.

No, I do have an overt political stance, it’s censors fuck off! I never stopped being a punk!

So what legal free speech ought to be allowed on all communications platforms. What next monitoring our phone calls and texts and canceling our service for wrong think? I give zero fucks about your moral policing based on the pseudo religious tenants of woke. I have an actual religion, so I have no need of your…

Hard agree, the only “trainwreck” is the overt cooperation between woke tech bro billionaires and woke journalists trying to defacto end the 1st Amendment which protects all political speech on our internet based virtual public square. I for one am grateful for Substack’s existence.

So, Jalopnik is owned by the ultra p.c Gizmodo group, you’d think they would thrilled Tesla is doing something about global warming? Oh I forgot imillenial hipsters live to whine about shit, dog forbid someone actually does something about a problem.

Yes and both Trump and Elon are moving from win to win, does that make you sad bitter nobody?

Turning Spock into a soy boy is sacralige 

Fortunately your bullying and authoritarian tactics are the good kind of bullying and authoritarian tactics.

Imagine I said all Muslims believe all X or Y, you’d scream not all Musllms while using the exact same tactic against all Trump supporters who cannot possibly know the views of seeing as you haven’t talked to all of them.

Literally no counter argument.

You are literally mentally ill if you think words have the power to physically harm people.

No they don’t academic displines lie the social sciences ate literally taught by 90% left leaning faculty.

Brilliant counter argument. Typical of the sort of thug who wants to end freedom of speech by mob coercion though.

Sounds like you are more interested in mass murder of political enemies than free speech?

Is this really the way you want to live stripping away the thin veneer of civilization and descending to who can shout down whom without any attempt to preserve debate based on evidence and reason. Not only is that a terrible idea for advancing human knowlodge it is a street battle you will lose as the right had far…

No that is totally false. Hollywood studios had no position of government authoritarity yet managed to censor communist writers like Dalton Trumbull in the 1950s.

Would you say the same thing if it was “national anarchist” assholes trying 5i drown out a speech by Noam Chomsky?

Preventing some from speaking is not itself speech it is speech surpressed behavior. Do you really not understand that? Literally no one is saying you can’t hold signs and pass out literature opposing a speaker’s point of view. What you are not allowed to do is thrown a tantrum and surpress someone’s rights because…

What if someone says the same about a communist speaker like Angela Davis considering commism led to millions of deaths in the 20th century? Aren’t we better off protecting both Mlio and Davis’s right to speak rather than descending into the barbarism of which side can form a larger mob to drown out the opinions they…

So you are totes cool if skinheads thugs shout down Noam Chomsky? Is this really how we want to live?