This is the same guy that joked about tweeking a reporter’s nipples on live TV. People ask DC these questions because they know he will give an answer like this. He’s a racing driver first and foremost.

i dunno, he seems like a pretty valid source on how hard it is to beat men in F1 to me.

Much the same system in some states of Australia. It’s no biggie. Some states don’t do it and the visible state of the fleet reflects this.

D.B. Pooper

I do believe it was a accumulation of infractions. They probably have a point system of some sort.

“Multiple” is what lead to severe

Reading is fundamental - she already had 9 points prior to this

Wolff was worried about her status as a role model

Headlines we decided were best not to use, in case you were curious about just how lame we all are: Just Another McLaren F1 GTR In The Wall, Dark Side Of The Hoon.

I had to rewatch the video several times, but you are exactly right - the beige car made essentially a two-lane change around that van. There’s no reasonable way that car could have realistically seen traffic coming up faster in the HOV lane. They clearly didn’t see the dash-cam vehicle - no way in hell they could…

You aren’t from around here, are you?

The car changed 2 lanes without looking. I do not care what speed the motorcycle was going in the open the lane. The fact is the car is the one at fault. If you actually think that lane change was safe then you should probably have your license taken away.

it’s the car’s responsibility to avoid hitting him. The bike was in his own lane, riding legally. The car hit him. It’s pretty clear cut.

Still the car’s fault though for not entering the lane safely. The law isn’t “do whatever and everyone else has to do their best to avoid you”.

How can a single actor in a multiple actor event be 100% at fault....but also “everyone screwed up”?

One of our oldest terms has been adopted by the Americans though and that is “dashboard”. A dashboard was originally placed at the front of a horse drawn carriage to prevent rocks and dirt from being flicked up at the driver by horses hooves as they “dashed”.

You are missing the entire point of this essay. Those examples you cited, were examples of our carriers operating unopposed. Terrell is saying that, if one of our carrier group goes up against an enemy that shoots back, ie Russia, China, or even frigging FRANCE, our carrier group could face a shocking defeat.

Terrell meant shooty war, not just launching air strikes like a one sided Starcraft Skytoss deathball.

I work at a Maserati and Alfa Romeo dealer and I am willing to bet the guy was only at the Lamborghini dealer to talk about how much he loves his mustang. I swear 4 out of 5 Mustang drivers that come by our store are just absolute tools. They’ll look at a 4C and just tell everybody that it’s cool and all but they…