Wait, does this mean $kay gives herself a picture of a sexy girl in front of a Ford GT (of which I’m sure she has hundreds)?

It looks like a blast!

Not criticizing anyone’s weight, but I agree; the motorcycle’s primary advantage is weight, and his extra 50-100lbs probably set him back significantly, especially in the launch.

Especially a nearly 20 year old R1. Sure, it’s pretty far from stock, but couple that with an amateur that looks like he nearly doubles the weight of the bike, and it’s not surprising how poor it does.

That’s not surprising at all. I think the motorcycle guy would have done better if he’d gone on a little diet though. Couldn’t they have found someone better than what sounds like an overweight amateur?

What a lovely way to start the week! I haz a happy! Thank you, Patrick!

I wonder if she went up, left, down, right, up, left, down, right R1, R1, and got her grenade launcher back.

We spend the most, because we have the most to spend. A better measure of military spending can be found by breaking down the total expenditure as a percentage of GDP. When you do that, the US is only the 4th highest.

Could argue it does. Socialist countries as a whole don’t typically seem to be paranoid enough to spend several countries worth of GDP to buy things to kill people.

To add to your post..

I see, thanks man.

So USA is socialist?

Paveway are also manufactured in the UK. The Paveway IV is manufactured in a Raytheon plant in Scotland, this is as a result of the UK being the main customer for Paveway IV. Most UK ordnance is manufactured in the UK. Hellfire is an exception. The UK has been buying them from the US for their Reaper and Apache…

The first rule of foreign policy: everyone is self-interested. Altruism exists, but not among nation states. Of course Europe is going to have limited defense spending, it means they can direct spending elsewhere and the act is relatively risk free due to how closely their foreign policy aligns with the United States.…

I thought socialism was bad because it meant massive military overspend at the expense of welfare services? Like in current NK and the old USSR, now it means ignoring military spending in favor of welfare services? Which is it?

Don’t understand the simplistic fixation on the ratio of fighters killed per munition dropped. The US has also conducted a systematic attack on oil infrastructure, command and training facilities, rolling stock, heavy weapons and cash repositories, all of which have consumed a large percentage of the weapons expended…

Hair! Hair!

Neither holds a candle to their european contemporaries from the 60's or 70's on a racetrack with corners.

I absolutely agree, it’s amazing what Radical have been quietly developing and honing into a razor sharp instrument of speed, sound and glorious feedback. Did i mention the Sound, akin to a perfectly tuned 2 stroke GP bike it set the hairs on the back of my neck into porcupine quills. It really is worth every penny of…

Also, I think they just wanted an excuse to drive this: