mrogny456074
Mr Ogny
mrogny456074

“While Yoffe’s use of data can be misleading”

It does, you just dont understand it.

They had an unhealthy obsession with violent jihad based on their religion.

Holy crap Anna. What a long piece and still Yoffe is more factual and probably right on this than you are. And of course more concise. Yeesh. Jesus. If you have a point or fact make it quickly.

This was a really long article that can basically be summed up as “Emily Yoffe was right, but because my views on the issue are extreme, I’m going to give a long winded explanation that does nothing to refute her point, but instead makes it”.

If you don’t think the couple involved had an unhealthy obsession with firearms and weapons in general, you haven’t been paying attention.

That said, gun control (or the lackthereof) is a problem that needs fixing.

Yes. When your reaction to the revelation that an accusation of rape turns out to be untrue is disappointment then you need to rescrew your head.

Bowdich asked for the public’s help, but added, probably futilely, “Please do not send us things that are obviously not pertinent to this matter.”

Right. And also, they cannot act as a de-fact legal system. We have one of those, and schools need to leave crime to the criminologists, judges, and juries.

Exactly.

How? He was excluded as being the “owner” of that condom by DNA testing. If anything, it’s exculpatory.

You stole my quote! But I was going to say, the individual instances are the makings of due process. Those who want to focus on the “forest” are moving toward a guilty until-proven-innocent paradigm—“see all these complaints? There must be truth to it!” That’s Yoffe’s argument. Granted this is the pendulum swinging

It’s no wonder people have to warp the facts when they have a neat little narrative that they’re trying to fit them into.

No shit, Professor Einstein.

Rolling Stone has a famously brutal fact-checking process? I am skeptical. Outside of the New Yorker, I don't know that any magazine has a rigorous process. And with UVA, RS appeared to have done zero fact checking.

“People get so into picking apart the individual instances that they can’t see the forest for the trees.”

I admittedly haven’t read the whole article. Read about a quarter of it. Will finish later.

Valuable cautionary tale for all young people. Alcohol can make things spin badly out of control.

The condom thing though... Willingham found a bloody condom, which was hers from a previous encounter, and accused Winston of using it while raping either herself or her friend. This whole thing is a murky mess, but that bit there seems pretty bad for Willingham’s credibility. KF lost months working with lawyers.