I just like that they met under a bridge.

That's what's great about South Park, characters behave based on their own personal rules and beliefs, lots of shows and movies have characters behave based on the role the character needs to play in the show/movie regardless if that is consistent with the internal character logic.

Basically it means somebody who believes the best way to tolerance and equality is hate or shaming those they perceive as intolerant with no regard as to whether the hate or shaming is every overkill or misapplied.

I don't think most people think anything was Cartman anymore. And Cartman does have redeeming characteristics. He was legitimately pumped for the LAN party they were going to have, and he does have actual affection for somebody like Butters, which is probably my favorite thing about him.

It's difficult. Because I do like him, but he does seem to be missing the point bad here. And the AVClub is so deep in certain territory that to expect him to be proper level headed is like expecting the same thing from somebody at huffingtonpost.

I'd watch that. Particularly because it would likely be somewhat fond of the berries like they are of Mormons, and honestly I do kinda like member berries. Say what you will, they are happy as fuck.

I'll let you know what it's like my first time

And then pick up the season with a Terrance and Phillip episode

I wonder if the warcraft guy will have any lines. I kinda hope not. That or it's somebody like George Clooney.

I think it's supposed to be Tiny-er (Tinier?)

Wooooooooooooooooow…. I'm sorry but I've never seen an AVClub reviewer so clearly miss the point. South Park expertly pointed out the hypocrisy within PC culture and the reviewer as a member of the culture had to do contortions to totally miss the point. For example:

I would say that about any given episode of a comedy sitcom. And a skit is kinda like an episode. Another way to think about it is this:
A point of a sitcom is to tell a story that is largely comedic. That means that every element needs to be serving either they bigger story, or the comedy. Since SNL isn't telling a…

Ok, see the way he phrased "scoring bakula for baby congratulations" I thought he meant "scoring" in a similar way that we were "counting" GREATJOB honks, which got me even more confused. I think it all adds up now though.

Shit I just noticed Killam and Pharoah gone. I know watching the opening credits that it looked sparser but I couldn't put my finger on it as to who was gone. Woah, wait, they MADE Killam leave? They fired him? I thought once you were that much of a main guy you could stay indefinitely. WTF

Bakula for baby congratulations? Can anybody explain what these words mean?

Disagree heavy with the reviewer. Hillary was totally fairly criticized. You know she is delighted by what Trump said. Hillary is the type of person who I sincerely don't know that if she heard that Donald Trump just murdered somebody her first thought wouldn't be "thank god, that's great for this election" rather…

I disagree that the episode was that good. I liked the Diego sketch too, I feel like they missed out on one or two more good jokes, but I really liked the tone they were going for.

I'm sorry but that is awful. "It's not supposed to be funny" is the only defense anybody ever gives, but if that's the case then it's totally out of place on SNL.

He should show up to write the lyrics when a funny writer is hosting. Him paired with somebody else could be like the best SNL ever. I liked him personally but it felt like his intelligence and enthusiasm was wasted on bits without premises. I hate bits without premises.

God, that turns him from like the most insufferable person ever to the most depressing