For the stand-up guy: take that as an opportunity to discuss every humiliating, soul-crushing bit of knowledge you have about the other people in the league.
For the stand-up guy: take that as an opportunity to discuss every humiliating, soul-crushing bit of knowledge you have about the other people in the league.
Someone want to take a stab at explaining why it's so obvious that Beyonce should have won without including claims from personal preference?
Right, I get what they thought they were doing, but "transferring" a robot brain into a human host is a fucking bizarre thing. What was the essence of the "robot" that could separated from the actual machine? Are there robot souls?
What was the name of that restaurant? Asking for a friend.
There is a significantly higher chance that I will just eat an incorrect order vs. going through the process of sending it back.
The Christian thing is relevant for the hypocrisy: they preach "charity," but are often assholes that take advantage of others.
This is an interesting article by a restaurant owner who eliminated tipping in one of his places:
I'll star that for the acid trip. I didn't like that they turned Grimlock into idiotic comic relief. When he first appeared, he was menacing as hell, just loosely affiliated with the Autobots, but you got the sense that he could and would turn on them at any time. He was a stunningly complicated sort of character for…
Right, but then you just have a collection of stories, the meaning of which is subject to the whims of the time. Certainly better from a moral perspective, but it does make one wonder why those stories have any more importance than anything else.
The last five years or so have been pretty stunning - the atheist "community" has revealed an incredible number of glibertarian assholes in its midst, so believe me, I'm much happier to break bread with liberal/progressive believers than regressive atheists.
Truly, he must be the first person who right about one thing and wrong about another.
Eh, this got boring.
Your primitive preferences are yours; expanding them into a normative definition, however, is where the misogyny lies.
Perhaps you should reread the first sentence of the last post.
Didn't say there was anything wrong with the women. The guys, however, that say shit like you...
Greta Van Sustere & Meygn Kelly are respected journalist and honored graduates with prestigious law degrees, but to you they're just eye candy for old crusty white segregationist. Sad..& ironicly sexist.
Paragraph 4 if you believe the media and individual cultivates preferences together, then what is the purpose of you repeatedly saying how the veiwer has no alternative but Fox News & their "Hot Blonds". Did you forget about other networks competing with Fox?
"Wrong! WRONG! dead Wrong There are multiple media outlets that cater to People of color. MSNBC, Fox Business and CNN all have black lead anchors. Stop the victimology crap. There is black represtation on the news. YOU LIE."
Not true in that scenario:
The police have a long and storied history of being tragically wrong in these situations.