If only the pesion debacle was the result of overly optimistic investment return assumptions, and fees charged by managers for sub-par performance. You also have situations where those that manage pension payments, like unions, apy out a “13th check” in years where returns on good. No, I’m nt making that up. These…
mrkurtz
mrkurtz1
I have no expertise in anything pertaining to this., but it seems to me that a software company could develop a rideshare app that allowed people with non-criminal histories, and good drving records, and safe vehicles, to display those attributes to people who need transportation, and offer rides at offered prices,…
Morons are a consistent source of irony.
When a guy has that kind of contract that Anthony has tacked to him, he damned well be a helluva lot better than “ on the whole a net positive”.
Admit it. You wre entertained when unarmed (despite owning enough firearms for a coup in a medium sized country) Double Entry Man , when confronted by a thug with a knife, whips his belt off from around his waist, and whips it, yo-yo, style, so the belt buckle smacks the knife wielder in the face.
It’s why Green’s rhetoric is a problem. It has the effect of painting slaveowners as merely being extremely unpleasant bosses.
This really trivializes the monumental evil of the slaveowners of the antebellum south. All kinds of people have “a sense of superiority”. Very few of those people have the belief that they can murder and mutilate, as they please, those they have a sense of being superior to.
The problem with the slavery analogy, that is so frequently used in the sports entertainment industry, is that it trivializes the essential element of slavery, which is a constant state of massively applied, illegitimate, violence.
It’s only ironic to someone who is too stupid to grasp, that, no, it isn’t acceptable for the Secretary of State to use a server she has complete control of, for tens of thousands of official communications, and then lie about it for months on end. The reason people misstate the facts is because it causes them psychic…
It’s puzzling that it has to be explained to you that if nobody cares about it, then there is no need to misstate the facts. This is kind of complicated, so try to follow. It is preferable to represent reality accurately, instead of inaccurately. Got it?
I cannot believe the level of ignorance in this thread. Yes, you ahistorical morons, guerilla tactics include charging the enemy. The point is that it is only done once the enemy has become overextended and/or it is unexpected. Good effin’grief.
Google “Viet Cong charged razorwire”. Congratulations, you may be the dumbest person on the internet today.
Oh fer the luv’ of Ho Chi Minh, you ahistorical halfwit, there are Vietnam vets today who can give you vivid accounts of Viet Cong guerillas charging the razor wire at American firebases. Seriously, google “Viet Cong charged razorwire”.
Oh, good grief, how do you manage to feed yourself.? I cited two things. The AP piece establishes that Secretary Clinton publicly lied for many months about her e-mails. I said nothing about lying under oath. The FBI cite establishes that some work related emails were forensically destroyed, that the FBI states it is…
I didn”t write the FBI said something about her lying, you pathetic illiterate. I wrote that she had publicly lied about the matter for months, and provided an AP cite which establishes this indisputable fact. What the hell is the matter with you?
Christ on a Crutch, you really are illiterate, aren’t you? I explicitly stated that the FBI’s judgement was that a person who publicly lied about her behavior for many months was now being forthright with regard to how all communications chosen for forensic destruction were so selected, despite indisputable proof that…
Hey, when the AP prints a long piece establishing the lies Secretary Clinton uttered, over many months, with regard to her emails, and you get the lower ranked chimps in the troupe chanting “No she did not lie, no she did not lie, no she did not lie.......”, well, the behavior is as described.
You apparently are illitetate. Comey states that the FBI can’t be certain (that’s what “we lack complete visibility” means, lackwit) of all the measures used to select all the emails that were designated for forensic destruction. They made a judgement that a person who had habitually publicly lied about an important…
Again, given the FBI can’t know what was destroyed, and can’t be certain as to how all the emails that were destroyed were selected for destruction, no such definitive judgement about lack of wrongdoing can be drawn. Sure, that precludes criminal prosecution (if we ignore that extreme carelessness has been the basis…