mrkurtz1
mrkurtz
mrkurtz1

Yes, their assessment was that a person who had continually publicly lied about her email practices for months was forthright and complete about what measures were taken to identify what emails were selected for forensic destruction. That’s certainly a judgement they are free to make, but it is only that, a judgement,

You are ignorant......

You need to read Comey’s July statement. He explicitly states that thousands of emails were destroyed, some were work related, and only discovered via examination of emails from other sources, and it is likely that some work related emails were lost forever.

Hey, I’m happy to see hom gone.

Dude, I wasn’t the one who introduced the topic of Secretary Clinton’s email into the thread. If people stop misstating the facts surrounding the matter, I’ll stop correcting them.

Powell’s work related emails were far, far, less numerous, and employed AOL servers, not a server physically controlled by Powell. These are critical differences.

You go ahead and keep hallucinating things that I wrote, which I did not, in fact, write. Hallucinating is what a tribalistic chimp like you typically does, in order to deal with the cognitive dissonance.

That was one her lies, that her behavior had precedent. The truth was otherwise.

Hey, dummy? The FBI Director explicitly stated that there was likely worke-related emails destroyed by her lawyers that could never be recovered, because the devices were cleaned in a way that prevented forensic recovery. In other words, neither you or I have any idea what the content was, or who it was shared with,

She lied about her treatment of official communications, including those marked classified, for months on end, then had her lawyers destroy tens of thousands of communications, then, when asked how it could be determined that those destroyed communications were not official or classified, her response was “trust me”.

It appears that Dolan has been lying for days now that Oakley was abusing people “the moment he entered the building”. It sounds as if MSG security has been harrassing Oakley every time he enters the building (if what Oakley claims, that they go so far as to follow him to the bathroom, is true), and Oakley reacts

Dolan has specifically stated, several times, that Oakley was abusive to people “the moment he entered the building”. These statements don’t support that. The only winesses alleging abusive behavior are security people who say he became abusive when he sat down, was being looked at by the security people. If Oakley

I’m listening to Bomani Jones right now, reading the witness statements that Dolan has released, that are supposed to support Dolan’s assertion that Oakley was abusive to people the moment he entered the building. So far, all the witnesses have described is a guy who looked “annoyed” at coupe of diferent things, like