mrjingle1984
mr_jingle
mrjingle1984

Your problem is that you’re assuming that F1 development will stand still. You’re also forgetting F1 already features hybrid engines with turbos, so who is to say how that hybrid technology will be utilized. It’s entirely plausible the electric motors will assist in acceleration in some form and have 0-60 splits as

Yes, but an F1 car can drive for 90 minutes at race pace without being refuelled. FE cars can do 45 minutes and are 20% slower than F1 cars. They’re so concerned about saving as much energy for racing as possible they don’t even do a warm up lap. Electric cars have a long way ago. T

And by the way, there is a world of

But it won’t be faster. It’ll have a faster 0-60 time, sure, but why does that matter? That’s just one random cherry picked metric.

F1 going electric would have very little to do with the pollution, and everything to do with having the fastest race cars having the fastest technology and a means for manufacturers to develop technology that can trickle from F1 cars to their super cars and eventually to their street cars.

Electric tech just isn’t

I think you’re grossly underestimating the challenge of charging or swapping out a battery with that level of charge in a quick and most importantly safe matter. You’re talking instant death of anyone involved if any part of that system fails. That’s not an easy problem to solve.

Because of that the only realistic

Well unless that minivan is going around the F1 layout of Spa in about 1:50 it really doesn’t matter if it can beat an F1 car in 0-60 acceleration. In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if there are several different racing series cars that can make that claim that still aren’t within a dream of lapping Spa that quickly

Nah. There’s a vocal minority that bitches about everything until Ferrari is winning with it, but for the most part the fanbase embraces the spirit of F1 that pushes the bleeding edge of technology year in and year out.

NASCAR on the other hand has a serious attendance and profitability problem that F1 doesn’t and need

It’s amazing how you’ve been watching F1 for 38 years and think an F1 isn’t as technologically advanced as a fucking Tesla in any way shape or form. As if Mercedes spends $450 million dollars a year on selecting just the right color of silver for their arrows and have a team of people stand around the garage and nod

Now playing

uhhh.... no.... that’s not how that works at all. Here’s a demonstration. The inside of the box represents the inside of the hyperloop.

Yep, so, now that you’re clearly done.

It’s amazing that you think that Destin would agree with you in any ways shape or form about what you think of the mechanics of evolution, how it works, what we expect to see as a result of it. Same goes for the big bang. He acknowledges and accepts both of them as valid, and

After all of this, you just turn around and say “but... bible, which is true because the bible says the bible is true!”

You’re worse than Kent Hovind. At least he pretends to understand the science. You just turn around and say it can’t be true because bible instead of actually considering *gasp* the bible might

Ahh, well so much for your supposed honest attempt at a conversation. Just crickets then, huh?

Figures. Have fun talking to your sky daddy and being super proud of your ignorance. Best of luck. You’ll need it.

lol not Canada either.

lol. ANd now you come slinking back to try and save face, but instead just show of even more ignorance. Nicely done.

Find me one, just one credible (as in widely accepted as a credible part of the scientific community by the scientific community) evolutionary biologist that says that “micro-evolution” is something this

And there it is. Rather than face your own intellectual blind spot I’ve pointed out, you’ve decided to pretend it doesn’t exist and move on. I’m sure you’ll project your own insecurities and ignorance onto me, and claim my unwillingness to pander to the nonsensical demands that themselves clearly display your poor

I notice you didn’t post a pic of the 2021 spec F1 car ;)

lol, no, my opinion is not gospel. That’s the beautiful thing about science. Good science does not care who it comes from. There are plenty of peer reviewed science journals out there pumping out volumes of credible studies that truly expands human knowledge. Please don’t take my word for it, go read the studies and

I don’t have any bonafides and my background is irrlevant. Science doesn’t care about whose performing it, it just cares about the rigor at which it is employed and the scrutiny it stands up to. There are no “authority figures” in science, only science itself.

I’m hung up on AIG because you still aren’t willing or or

Yeah, your brain doesn’t work right. If you think I was using “pseudo-science” as a synonym for “god”, you really, really need to work on your reading comprehension.

You didn’t ask scientific questions about the beginning of the universe. You asked ignorant questions based on a incredibly flawed, ignorant

What about the extra-biblical references? Just because Jesus might have been a real person doesn’t make anything else in the bible credible. It just means jesus might have been a real person. That’s it. Your thought process is completely fucked.

I don’t need to prove AIG is terrible resource. Anyone with a basic